the globe

Part of my effort to see every Shakespeare play.

It’s been said, not unreasonably, that Henry IV Part 2 is something of a filler story between the clash of titans in Henry IV Part 1 and whatever happens in Henry V. Both of the two plotlines of the first part are carried forward – the continued rebellion against Henry IV and the jollies of Falstaff, with Prince Hal transitioning between the two, but this time the stories are more separate. Hal has made his commitment to kinghood and he and Falstaff barely speak. The rebels have been scattered and their leader is dead, so much of their story involves people standing in corners frustratedly shouting at each other. Consequently, much of the play is taken up with the adventures of Falstaff.

Prince Hal steps up to kingship.

This was not an accident, Falstaff was an extremely popular character when he first appeared on stage and so takes a larger role in the sequel and then got a whole play to himself in the Merry Wives of Windsor. He is a ridiculous unrepentant layabout and Helen Schlesinger again gives it all in gusto. She took advantage of the protuding stage into the audience in full, striding over and taking audience’s cans of beer and swigging them while delivering her monologues about sack. I noted to myself “not a lot happens but it’s great”.

As with Henry IV Part 1, there is a stripped down cast with each playing multiple characters, but in this performance, it had been made more explicit. I watched in absolute amazement as a scene in a brothel with Falstaff and his servant Ancient Pistol emptied out, leaving only his Mistress Doll Tearsheet, who slowly started to remove her garments and wipe the lipstick from her face until King Henry IV was before us. I had not noticed they were the same actor, at all, until that moment. It was probably the most striking part of the play for me.

Doll Tearsheet/Henry IV
Uneasy lies the head that wears a crown.”

The monologue that Henry IV goes on to deliver mentions his intended promise to go on pilgrimage to the Holy Land to make up for stealing the crown of Richard II, which I had seen staged seen earlier in the year. It was one of several moments that were essentially fan service for those who’ve seen all the plays. Henry IV then dies and Prince Hal becomes Henry V, to the rapture of his former drinking buddies including Falstaff, who hurtles down to the front of the stage/London to await his coronation. Unfortunately and to Falstaff’s great surprise, King Henry V repudiates him in public and moves on. The actor played it brilliantly, and you could feel his genuine sorrow underneath the bluster.

The play then ended rather abruptly, which I was somewhat surprised for what is, after all, a product of one of our greatest playwrights. I’ve looked at the text and there is an epilogue that I believe was missed out of the performance, perhaps because it references Falstaff appearing in Henry V, which he doesn’t, or perhaps because it was a bit to Elizabethan (asking the audience to pray for the queen). I don’t know, but that might at least solve the mystery.

This was also another play where I took someone along who had never seen a *play* before, never mind Shakespeare, but had absolutely loved it and said that he’d never thought of Shakespeare as something performed in front of drunks cheering you on (they weren’t that drunk). Falstaff for the win!

A scene from Henry IV Part 2 or Falstaff by The Globe Ensemble @ Shakespeare’s Globe

Related Posts:

{ 0 comments }

Part of my effort to see every Shakespeare play.

Michelle Terry as Hotspur.

Henry IV Part 1, or “Hotspur” as they subtitled it, is one of the most popular plays in Shakespeare’s canon, which was good to see after one of the least popular. The story of a rebellion against King Henry IV by the tempestuous Sir Henry Percy leading to the castastrophic Battle of Shrewsbury where Percy is slain is intertwined with a secondary story of young Prince Hal, future Henry V, wasting his days away with a band of wastrels amusing themselves in between drinking buts with pranks and petty thefts. The bildungsroman of Prince Harry from jack-the-lad to King of England is the central plot of all three Henry plays, so the Globe decided to put all three on with the same ensemble cast to make that point.

Having come from Richard II, of which I did not have a high opinion, I was pleased to be shown what a serious play done well looked like. This play also had gender swaps (Hal is played by Sarah Amankwah, who completely nails transitioning from gadfly to heir to the throne) but it is presented as just a practical reality rather than a marketing USP. In fact, I was really impressed with the fact that at one point, one of the characters calls on his wife to sing a song for the audience and a male actor stepped out in a dress and delivers a somber song with a lyre that was initially taken with some amusement by the audience but who then immediately took the song as in the tone as presented to them.

The happy-go-lucky Prince Hal.

The battle scenes and drama between the two sides, royal and rebellious, is powerful and at times, when battle is finally joined, breath-taking. Michelle Terry plays the feisty and furious Percy, and, let me say it now, is fit af. I couldn’t take my eyes off her, as she justifiably dominated every scene. The difference between plays like Pericles and plays like Richard III and Henry IV in terms of their stakes and your investment in the plot is really quite, uh, dramatic.

Having said that, the show is stolen by Falstaff every time he sets foot on stage. The hedonistic companion of Hal, running away from anything that looks difficult and urging everyone to drink harder and deeper, is the comic character of the play and Helen Schlesinger blew everyone away with her performance. Again the audience interaction element of performances at the Globe came into their own with such a character.

Which was all the more significant given Falstaff kept forgetting her lines. As it happened, I’d booked my tickets for a captioned performance, so all the lines of the play was projected on either side of the stage for people to read (they do audio described and relaxed performances as well). I really like captions, and particularly for Shakespeare they make it so much easier to understand what is going on. But in this performance, it was also apparent when the actors had swapped lines, or forgotten them, and it was interesting that Falastaff did this in nearly every scene. Her efforts to cover up fluffs with little stage tricks which to an audience without captions looked like audience interaction or comic moments became somewhat obvious the second you have the script in front of you, and laid it somewhat bare. It was an unfortunate look at how the sausage is made.

The riotous Falstaff.

I don’t know whether for a Shakespearian audience, the events of Henry IV Pt 1 must have seemed like relatively recent history or not, but for me it certainly felt a lot closer to something “real” than the plays of antiquity like Troilus and Cressida or Pericles. The addition of the flags around the theatre of the main protagonists and the very real historical figures who shaped the England we live in today made the blurb seem more relatable than some of the others they’ve tried to sell me on:

Two Harrys: Harry Hotspur and Prince Hal.
Sons to enemy fathers: Henry Percy and King Henry IV.
Hotspur is preparing to lead an army against the King – incensed at the King’s dismissal of the Percy family’s demands.
But Hal is occupied in the pubs and streets of Eastcheap with his companion Sir John Falstaff, uninterested in his inheritance and in the fate of his country.
In a polarised England, each person must choose which truth to believe, and which cause to call their own.

Despite the drama, there was another song and dance number at the end of the play, so I guess that is a thing that the Globe just does. It was great, and I would love every theatre to bring back that tradition instead of just taking a bow.

A scene from Henry lV Part l or Hotspur by The Globe Ensemble @ Shakespeare’s Globe

Finally, I had a spare ticket after one of my Slam crew dropped out, and after advertising it on Facebook, took a friend along who had never seen a Shakespeare play before and is more into death metal than theatre. He absolutely loved it, said it was unlike anything he had expected, Shakespeare was amazing, and that he’d had a great night out. I feel like I have graduated from a Shakespeare noob to nerd. :D

Related Posts:

{ 1 comment }

Shakespeare Slam: Pericles, Prince of Tyre

July 21, 2019

Part of my effort to see every Shakespeare play. Pericles, Prince of Tyre, is another one of the Shakespeare plays where, when I told people I was going to see it, largely responded with, “Shakespeare wrote that? I’ve never heard of it?!” The story of a royal prince who is shipwrecked and is left to believe […]

1 comment Read the full article →