aaron porter

So, 4000 people marched in Manchester on Saturday against the cuts to education with the TUC, the NUS, EAN, NCAF, Manchester Against Cuts and Fees, and I’m sure a whole bunch of other organisations as well that felt like telling people to go march on the 29th of January. Instead of covering that, or the police brutality that landed at least person in hospital that I know of, dozens more battered, and got 25 people arrested for being in the wrong place at the wrong place, the media decided to go with “NUS President attacked by anti-semitic abuse”.

Tracking down this origins of this story leads to a Daily Mail article, in which an anonymous photographer heard the words “Tory Jew scum” being shouted at Aaron. That’s a pretty serious allegation. Unfortunately, people just repeating it over and over again on their Facebook statuses does not make it true.

Here is the footage of Aaron Porter at the time he was alleged to have been abused, as he walked (not particularly fast for a man being “hounded”) down to MMU away from the two hundred people telling him to go away:

Watch the video all the way through, then go back and listen hard at 5:39. The crowd, clearly still shouting the same chant, “Aaron Porter, we know you, you’re a fucking Tory too” as they have been in the previous five minutes, sounds very much like they are indeed shouting “You’re a fucking Tory Jew.”

Now, maybe I am mistaken, and many of my friends who were at that demonstration are actually virulently anti-semitic whenever I’m not around. Yes, that’s probably it. In fact, “you’re a Tory Jew” wasn’t the only slogan that these vicious, secret anti-Semites-dressed-up-as-students-bothered-by-their-crap-leadership come up with. Now listen to the video again:

* At 2:15, that person shouting “”sell-out”? Actually shouting the word “selah”, a term used in the Hebrew Bible to indicate a musical interlude. This is obviously a reference to Aaron’s Jewishness. Bastards.

* 2:50, the crowd stop shouting “scum” and are clearly bellowing “skunk”, a type of gas that the Israeli government have been known to use on Palestinian protestors. It’s just such a natural thing to come to mind on a protest about cuts to education.

* 3:35, a man calls Aaron Porter a “joke”. Really? “Joke”? Or… “Jew”? Oh, the humanity.

* At 4:05, “get out” is just obviously you missing hearing the German phrase “geht auf”, or “go on”. The context of such anti-semitic hatred and choice of tongue are intended to invoke the Holocaust. It just seems so obvious when you think about it and let go of all reason in the name of political point-scoring.

* Calling for Aaron Porter to be burned at 4:20, a cheap, childish offensive taunt? Or a deliberate identification with the Eastern Orthodox ritual of burning the Jewish Judas Iscariot for betraying Jesus? Christ, I surprised this crowd didn’t just shout Jesus-killer at Aaron and be done with it.

* But even saying that, these nasty little racists offer hope at 6:05 that Aaron will one day be redeemed: you might think that the crowd are shouting, “Students and workers, unite and fight”, but does it not make more sense they are actually calling on Aaron to join them as they chant, “Judas and workers, unite and fight”?

So maybe, maybe someone actually did shout “Tory Jew scum” at Aaron Porter. And maybe there were some other protesters who shouted “no to racism, no to racism”, as the Telegraph reported. But they must have been doing it really, really quietly. Maybe it happened. Or maybe a miserable little right-wing hack sent to cover those damn trouble-making students heard what he wanted to hear. Make up your own mind.

The vast majority of people who were on the demo whom I have spoken to about this alleged anti-Semitic abuse have had the initial reaction “What?!”, followed by “I didn’t hear anything like that!”, and finally, “Aaron Porter’s Jewish? Who knew that?”. Shouting “Tory Jew scum” at someone because they happen to be a rubbish student leader seems rather inexplicable, especially as unlike his predecessor, Aaron hasn’t really done much for the Zionist cause, which is what usually prompts such attacks.

Was Aaron Porter racially abused on the 29th January? I have no idea. But I think we need a bit more evidence for such a serious allegation than an anonymous photographer claiming he heard a phrase that sounded remarkably similar to a non-racist chant. And I have yet to hear any.

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

{ 15 comments }

Following the fun and games of the vote in the House of Commons on the proposed tripling of tuition fees on the 9th December, 2010, Sean Rillo Raczka has very kindly written a model motion to put through your union general meeting/council/executive to bring about a motion of no confidence in Aaron Porter, NUS President. The reasons for doing so are included in the motion below.

Talk about no confidencing Aaron has been bandied about since the 10th November protests when Aaron spent more time condemning his own side than talking about why ordinary students (and significantly, they were ordinary students) felt the need to destroy property in frustration at the futility of the political process. He’s been losing credibility ever since, and I think this has been regrettably demonstrated by the near total absence of the NUS from the recent protests.

Size of the NUS demo on the 9th December:

The UCU NUS demonstration on Victoria Embankment.

Who's the minority of fringe protesters now?

I was in a pub on Whitehall when the vote on tuition fees passed by 21. As Aaron has rightly pointed out, we nearly achieved the impossible: nearly the entire backbench Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Party voted against, and two ministers resigned rather than vote for. Even more significantly, a Tory resigned and six voted against. That is a phenomenal lobbying achievement – and it still failed. Aaron Porter just wants us to try again. And people are surprised that the massed crowds waiting outside took their anger out on the Treasury’s windows?

Size of the Parliament Square demo on the 9th December:

And what did Aaron Porter do? Have a go at the protesters, again. Never mind that we have people in hospital. In fact, if you watch the video of the policeman who fell off his horse below, if you watch the people behind him holding each other, you will notice that just for standing there they were batoned and hauled off by eight policemen (one of whom falls over his own fallen colleague in his hurry to assault the protesters). Those people were from Manchester University and were detained for five hours before they were even allowed to see a doctor, despite having been batoned on the head and passing in and out of consciousness. Does Aaron give a crap about that?

So, below is the motion, and for those of you who hope he’ll just go away. it turns out that Aaron Porter wants another year in power anyway. You can pass this motion through any union decision making body, be it general meeting, council, exec or whatever – please encourage all your unions around you to vote on it as well. FE colleges are especially good for this. :)

“This is a suggestion for a model motion of No Confidence in Aaron Porter to put to your SU meetings or Council. You can change (add or subtract) it or write your own. Points 4, 4.1 and 4.2 MUST be included in any motion though, they are the important points. Have this motion sent to NUS (contact me if you need details) by your Sabbs asap once passed, and let me know too.

Basically if we get 25 Unions to pass this, we get to have an Extraordinary Conference where we can put the motion of no confidence and present the case. All Unions can send delegates to this conference; it does tend to be full of sabbatical officers, and therefore less likely to take action against the leadership.

If the motion passes at this conference the Deputy President (Shane Chowen, VP FE) would become President. However, the idea is to make sure the NUS centre/centre-right knows we won’t put up with their spineless leadership. We will be demanding a National Union that can live up to its member at this crucial time.

Any questions please ask.

Sean Rillo Raczka
Birckbeck SU and NUS NEC (pc!)
seanrillo@hotmail.com

Motion of No Confidence in Aaron Porter:

1 This Union Notes:
1.1 That on the 9/12/10 over 30,000 students marched from the University of London Union (ULU) to Parliament in a protest against fees and cuts on the day of the vote the raise tuition fees.
1.2 That the National Union of Students organised a candlelight vigil and rally in Victoria Embankment with under 1,000 attending.
1.3 That the NUS NEC, in a proposal made by NUS President Aaron Porter, voted NOT to back the march from ULU.
1.4 That Aaron Porter stated he was ‘not at all proud’ of the ULU protest.
1.5 That the co-ordinators of the NUS Rally at Victoria Embankment urged those in attendance to return home immediately afterwards and not to join the protest in Parliament Square.
1.6 That violent police tactics including kettling, horse charges and the use of batons were deployed by the Met, leaving over 43 protestors injured or hospitalised, including one life threatening injury.
1.7 That the NUS has not put out an official statement condemning the police violence towards students on the 9th of December, standing up for their right to protest and not be illegally kettled or charged by horses.
1.8 That Aaron Porter recently visited the UCL Occupation where he stated that the NUS would provide support for those in occupation, as well as calling a National Demonstration on the day of the fees vote.
1.9 That at the UCL Occupation meeting Aaron Porter admitted that the NUS had been ‘spineless’ and ‘dithering’ in response the student occupations.
1.10 That Aaron Porter has reneged on both promises mentioned above (1.8).

2 The Union Further Notes:
2.1 That emails leaked to the Daily Telegraph show that the NUS had put models of alternative cuts to Ministers, outlining where cuts could be made to the Higher Education budget without raising tuition fees. These plans included cutting grants to the poorest students, and immediately charging a higher commercial rate on interest on student loans.
2.2 That the NUS response to this leak is to admit that they had ‘met with ministers and officials to discuss and model various potential impacts of cuts to Higher Education’

3. This Union Belives:
3.1 That the National Union of Students should not be in the business of modelling cuts for the ConDem Government or discussing possible ways of cutting grants from the poorest of student.
3.2 That the NUS National President should keep his promises.
3.3 That the NUS should organise another National Demo, and officially supporting and coordinating other demonstrations and protest.
3.4 That the NUS should give practical support to occupations and students affected by police violence.
3.5 That Aaron Porter, given his failure to assist students & occupation, and to coordinate or support further National Demonstrations against the cuts, and because of his helpful emails to the government, is incapable of leading the student movement.

4 This Union Resolves:
4.1 That we have no confidence in Aaron Porter as NUS President.
4.2 To call for an Extraordinary Conference to hear this vote of no confidence.

END

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/universityeducation/8190379/National-Union-of-Students-secretly-urged-Government-to-make-deep-cuts-in-student-grants.html

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2010/nov/28/student-leader-apologises-over-dithering

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qpRCDmhhgrg”

We will not stand for cuts, or people who won’t stand with us!

Sean’s motion available here.

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

{ 2 comments }

Some perspective on Millbank, the NUS, and its aftermath

November 16, 2010

I’ve been a bit mean about the NUS and its hypocritical, lying, self-serving excuses for “leaders” lately, and I wanted to clarify some things. To coin a standard slimy politician phrase, let me be absolutely clear: we need a national co-ordinated student movement to campaign on behalf of students, to advocate for students, and to […]

2 comments Read the full article →