Opinion

DUP- Conservative deal signing looks like a gay wedding where neither set of parents approve

Originally posted to Facebook.

re the Tory-DUP agreement: I’m just going to be really honest and say I have absolutely no idea what the politics of our country is going to look like for the next six months.

The Government has literally sold out the nations and thrown a billion pounds at Northern Ireland in order to buy the votes of a particular party and there’s so many ways that could get pulled apart – but at the end of the day they have the votes to remain the Government.

But the agreement could be reviewed at any time by either party and the DUP have demonstrated how good they are at extracting goodies from a Prime Minister over a barrel.

But the DUP hate Labour and don’t want Jeremy Corbyn in power because he’s sympathetic to Sinn Fein.

But there’s several people planning legal challenges to the agreemnt on the basis that it invalidates the neutrality of the British Government set out in the Good Friday Agreement.

But the DUP are currently caught up in a corruption scandal over which Sinn Fein demanded the resignation of Arlene Foster which is why the devolved government was dissolved in the first place and it’s entirely plausible that they won’t form a government this week and James Brokenshire will have to call new elections, and who knows how the Northern Irish electorate will respond to this.

But he might not and impose Direct Rule from Westminster – a rule which is currently being propped up by the DUP.

But maybe all of this is irrelevant and they’ll just form a Government and we’re stuck with a Tory government clinging to power by its fingertips.

Will Theresa May be removed from power?

Will the Tories be able to pass *any* legislation not related to Brexit or counter-terrorism?

How are they going to pass any legislation *related* to Brexit when her own party has enough hardcore Remainers/Brexiters to render irrelevant the votes of the DUP if they decide to rebel?

And what are they going to do even if they do survive into 2018 and they lose enough by-elections through normal attrition that even with the DUP the Government no longer has a majority?

Like seriously, none of this has any precedent and I have no idea how this is going to go down.

Remember when people used to complain about how all the parties were the same and nothing ever changed? How do you think they like it now?

Related Posts:

{ 0 comments }

Originally published to Facebook.

 

I posted several times last night about Croatia’s Eurovision entry (which was ROBBED), and on each post someone different (LGBT and not) made sure to post that in 2005 Jacques Houdek gave an interview in which he made some unpleasant comments about gay people and same sex marriage and was subsequently named “Homophobe of the Year” by an online LGBT website.

I replied each time noting that if being against same sex marriage in 2005 was the most homophobic thing they could identify in Croatia, truly it must be a queer paradise. Gay men are being put in concentration camps in Chechnya and the UK’s got lesbians being beaten up on the streets of Brighton in 2017, and some dude calling gay marriage sick was the most homophobic thing that happened in Croatia in 2005? I have my suspicions around the legitimacy of this “award”.

But I woke up this morning and I still felt pretty troubled by the whole thing for a number of reasons:

1) I’m pretty uncomfortable around having my rights used as a litmus test for who is and is not socially acceptable for liberals. A comment here or there on LGBT issues, however long ago you made it or regardless of the context you made it in, can be enough for a huge swath of respectable society to just dismiss anything else you say or do off the bat, no further questions asked – something people generally just don’t do with regard to, say, support for military intervention in third countries (unless it’s Israel…), even though that is a much more immediate life-or-death issue. I’m not really ok with being someone else’s rule of thumb.

2) The transition of public support for LGBT rights from absurd deviancy to political no-brainer in the West has been so swift, so complete, that many people seem to have forgotten that in 2005, casual homophobia was so widespread and so obvious that ordinary people barely registered they were doing anything hurtful. It was in 2005 that I was homophobically bullied in school and when my mother complained, my pastoral care manager explained that they had said the things they said because they thought I was a lesbian – as if that explained everything and thus warranted no further action. The year before, 11 American states enacted by popular referendum constitution bans on same sex marriage. By 2012, 30 American states had such bans. In 2017, 65% of the US population now supports same sex marriage. In 2013, 400,000 people marched against same sex marriage in France. We are forgetting just how seismic this change has been and what our social context for treating LGBT people used to be like. Our press and literature is littered from that time period with things that many people said that they probably wouldn’t dream of now.

3) At some point, we have to accept that not everyone had good solid politics from birth. You are not Jeremy Corbyn. I am not Jeremy Corbyn. We learn to be better people over time. When I first left home in 2008, I said things about non-binary trans people that I would never say now and indeed would intervene with anyone who did. Times have changed and I have learned. But what if in 2008 I had said those things in a medium that recorded what I had said and made it instantly available to anyone looking me up for the rest of my life? Jacques Houdek published a retraction in 2011 and even he’s still being hounded over the original comments twelve years later, despite having said nothing objectionable since (at least, that anyone in English has noted) and despite participating in Eurovision in a leather double-breast, duetting with himself. At what point are we going to let people move on from the people they were?

I guess what I’m trying to say is that absent a database for each individual with everything they’ve ever said where they can give real-time updates on their current thinking on every conceivable issue, at some point we have to start being a bit more critical about the things we read about people on the internet and sustaining memetic clickbait that dogs people for their mistakes indefinitely.

Maybe we can enjoy someone׳s current work without being obliged to ostracise them for comments they made over a decade prior.

Maybe we can recognise that we weren’t all born into communities that nailed LGBT issues first time around.

Maybe we can actually celebrate diversity.

 

——-

Jacques Houdek’s statement in 2011 after being nominated for Homophobe of the Decade by Zagreb Pride (as mutilated by Google Translate):
“‘LOVE AND MUSIC ARE MY MOVIE’

“I am very sorry that the associations that promote LGBT people have been included in this election, the obvious purpose of which is to discredit me and the other nominees. It is not true that I am a homophobic, which can be confirmed by my friends, colleagues and acquaintances from business circles who are gay orientations. Likewise, any form of hatred does not correspond to my personality, so to call me ‘heyter’ or ‘greatest homophobic on Croatian estrade’, at least in the least incorrect because no such evidence exists for such accusations. Never one of the aforementioned associations ever asked me for an opinion, and if they want to ask, I can freely answer. I love music from love, love is my main driver in life and I really have nothing against love of any kind. Well, next week my new single comes out with a wonderful message, “I’m lucky to have you,” so I’ll be glad that all the people are willing to consecrate their loved ones. Love for All! ‘”

https://www.facebook.com/notes/jacques-houdek/službeno-očitovanje-jacquesa-houdeka-o-izboru-za-homofoba-desetljeća/10150203728332227/

 

Related Posts:

{ 0 comments }

Six Months After Brexit

December 21, 2016

Originally posted as a Facebook comment. Edited and updated for clarity. Six months on from Brexit, the debate is still raging over what we should do now. As the government continues to fight a court case to force it to pass Parliamentary legislation to invoke Article 50, many people who voted Remain have been accusing […]

0 comments Read the full article →

We need some new lefty post-facts.

December 21, 2016

Originally posted to Facebook, 13th November 2016. ‘Make America Great Again’ could just have easily referred to a platform built on free college education, equality before the law, universal healthcare, or TARP, or Barack Obama’s action to save the American auto industry. The handwringing on the part of liberals about whether the left did this […]

0 comments Read the full article →

Guy Verhofstadt MEP Addresses European Parliament on Brexit (28th June, 2016).

December 21, 2016

It is often argued by people who wish to remain part of the European Union that the fears expressed by people who wish to leave because they fear a federalised United States of Europe are just fear-mongering and there is no substance to it. What few federalists exist, they argue, they have little voice and […]

0 comments Read the full article →

Specific Things I Don’t Like About The European Union

June 27, 2016

Originally posted to Facebook, 26th June, 2016. Edited for clarity. I was asked: “What are examples of things that the EU have control over that you don’t like? When you say, “we get considerable sovereignty back over stuff that I think is important”, do you have examples of things ? Like, I don’t think I […]

1 comment Read the full article →

Lexit: The Case for the European Economic Area

June 26, 2016

Posted to Facebook on the 26th June, 2016 as two separate responses to a comment on this post. Edited for clarity. What Is the European Economic Area? Here’s exactly how the EEA works: http://www.efta.int/eea/eea-agreement/eea-basic-features Essentially, we retain access to the common market, and in return we have to provide the Four Freedoms, “the free movement […]

1 comment Read the full article →

Lexit: A response to this weekend.

June 26, 2016

Posted to Facebook 25th June, 2016. Edited for clarity. So, it’s been a couple of days since we decided to leave the European Union. Many people have had extreme feels on the result, but I think the shock is wearing off. So some thoughts on what people have been saying: 1. Democracy doesn’t start or […]

1 comment Read the full article →

Lexit: The Morning After

June 26, 2016

Posted to Facebook 24th June 2016. Some edits for clarity. Today was always going to be a day of recriminations and backlash for millions of people, whatever the outcome. Maybe you just weren’t expecting you would be one of them. But I was one of the most prominent people advocating a Leave vote that many […]

0 comments Read the full article →

The EU Referendum: Do you REALLY want to vote with [person I hate]?

June 22, 2016

I had a much, much longer blogpost that was going to rebut the main arguments of both the Leave and Remain campaigns and make my own case for why we should vote Leave on grounds of democracy, but technical problems got in the way and it was never finished to the standard that would have […]

0 comments Read the full article →