Archive for the ‘Personal’ Category

How to Deal with Friends and Folks Who Just Mess You Up

Monday, August 8th, 2011

Friendship 2 How to Deal with Friends and Folks Who Just Mess You Up

Holding hands is a sign of friendship in many countries, and is totally gay in others. Make your choice.


A lot of people spend time thinking about their partners and how to make their relationships work out and get better, but I wonder how many of us really put as much thought and effort into our friendships? I don’t think it is any secret to those of you reading this who know me personally that I have had a lot of drama llama this year over my friendships, and a lot of the people whom I have spoken to about the issue seem to find it quite hard to understand why I have been so deeply affected by the actions of my friends.

But why the hell wouldn’t I? Your friends are going to outlast most of our partners at this age, and you have more of them to manage. But for some reason friends are dropping of our to-do list of things that are important. The Naked Photo Test, or, to whom would you be prepared to confide a photo of you doing something utterly shameful and embarrassing, shows that most people have two people they really trust. But 25% of people don’t have anyone.

I just say this to make the point that friends are important. In fact, I think you should all stop reading here right now, and go tell one of your friends that you love them. I’ll wait right here. Go on.

No, actually go do it. Text, email, FB, just go do it.

Ok. You have no doubt made someone feel quite happy and quite confused. If you couldn’t think of anyone you would be prepared to say that to, you should stop reading this article and go make some friends immediately. Actual friends, not activity buddies.

CentreFriendsMeetingInterior How to Deal with Friends and Folks Who Just Mess You Up

A Friends' Meeting House. Nothing to do with this article, but it was a funny search result.

And the reason that I make that distinction is because what I really want to talk about is not how to make friends, but knowing when you need to lose them. See, I had a friend, whom I finally got round to blocking a year and a half after I realised that our friendship was screwed, in June. We were not very nice to each other in that time, with particularly memorable nastiness from them including:

* breaking into my computer and my email
* threatening to use confidential information obtained from me via my flatmate to try to break up my best friend from their boyfriend and boasting to me about it
* telling people that I was supporting in an election that I was publicly telling everyone to vote for their opponent
* telling me they had never received an important document that I needed them to fill out when they had actually opened it in front of my flatmate and left it in his room
* telling a work colleague that I am mentally ill

And I kind of just put up with all of that out of some folorn hope that they would stop being a twat, because I loved them, a great deal. And also because I was a moron – looking back at that list, it seems almost incredible that I harboured some desire of rekindling a friendship with someone who had no qualms about hurting me in every way imaginable for a fleeting second of gain.

Because it seems despite what we’re told by our culture and media, that love conquers all (amor omnia vincit, for you geeks out there), that all you need is love, that if you just communicate your feelings, everything will be fine with everyone – well, it seems that’s just drivel sometimes. (Particularly if, as I suspect, your friend happens to be a psychopath – but that’s not relevant to you. Update: link changed because the Guardian one died)

Nail polish drop How to Deal with Friends and Folks Who Just Mess You Up

This was what came up when searching 'psychopath' - I'm using a better search engine form now on, I swear.

What finally made me metaphorically shut the door in the end was the discovery that this person had deleted me from Facebook (I will not pretend that I was all love and bouquets – I gave as good as I got, but I do claim self-defence). By bizarre coincidence, I saw them in person about twenty minutes later, and we spent the entire evening getting drunk and discussing our “issues”. We talked about “respecting each other’s space” and “not being a twat” anymore. We said we wanted to be friends. I went to bed hopeful, if somewhat skeptical. I woke up the next day to greet a hangover and the news that they’d been planning to screw me over the next day the entire time we’d been talking (I’d call being able to get on with someone superficially and promising to repair your relationship whilst simultaneously preparing the opposite deeply psychopathic, actually – but we’re not talking about that right now). I was devastated.

It turns out that relationships that you have with other people that are “ambivalent friendships” – i.e. you have some good times with them but they also take every opportunity to kick you when you’re down, then swear they’re sorry and make it up to you, then kick you again – are actually far more harmful to people psychologically than if you just hate someone. You know where you stand with people who just plain despise you. What I’ve learnt from this experience is that letting someone continue to drain you of your energy and happiness because they’re a short-termist selfish pathological liar, albeit one that you’re quite fond of, is ultimately going to leave you with depression in the short term and stress-related health problems in the long term. True friends are people who are worth fighting for – friends that you sort of keep around because they’ll mutter nice things to you when you want to talk about the fact that they’re making you miserable, are not.

Friends season one cast How to Deal with Friends and Folks Who Just Mess You Up

Remember when Joey made Chandler sit in a box over Thanksgiving as a way of proving their friendship? That's what I like to see.

After finally ridding myself of the expectation that I would ever have a meaningful friendship with this person again, I swore to myself in July that no friend of mine would get to string me along again with nice words whilst ultimately hurting me with their actions. I looked up non-violent communication, I read about dealing with difficult people, and then I assessed who among my friends was getting me down.

Some of those people have been deleted and forgotten (deletion from Facebook being the ultimate sign of disfavour…). Some I’ve realised that the way that I talk to them is causing the friendship dynamic that is getting us down, and I have talked it over with them to sort it out – that’s ongoing. Someone with whom I was developing a business idea was told in no uncertain terms that I was no longer prepared to tolerate the way they behaved towards me – they continued, and I duly ended that aspect of our friendship, to their surprise. I am hopeful that that particular friendship will now be much stronger without any more resentment laid upon it.

I feel like I now have a lot more control over my life, and I no longer have any “ambivalent friendships” that I think have no future. I cannot help but regret that I had to trash a friendship that had meant so much to me in the past, but what I really understand now is that you cannot allow the past to draw a veil over the fact that someone is being an irredeemable arse in the present. Life’s too short.

I invite you all to look at your friendships, and see who you would entrust your Naked Photo to (maybe if you haven’t told them you love them already, you should just go quickly do that now, this article’s nearly done), and who you’re ultimately friends with because you don’t want to face up to the reality of the fact that they make you miserable. Don’t let someone get you down because they only say they like you.

Oh, and if you’re reading this and I haven’t sent you an email telling you I’m not happy with our friendship? I love you.

19970210150105436287821 How to Deal with Friends and Folks Who Just Mess You Up

Me and my motley crew of chums. God love 'em.

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

Cool Charities to Give to in 2011

Monday, July 18th, 2011

Every year I try to donate a portion of my income to charity. This year its been a bit lower because I wasn’t getting lots of money from the Student Loans Company. I used to try to find a single charity to donate to, such as the Iranian Queer Railroad, to whom I donated in memory of my friend Jeff, but this year, as last year, I donated to several different charities and write about them here. However this year, I have also added charities you can volunteer for if you don’t have any money to give.



Lama Foundation

general intro8 Cool Charities to Give to in 2011

The Lama Foundation is one of the few intentional communities left over from the 1960s. It’s a non-denominational spiritual community that is, quite frankly, AMAZING, and everyone should go visit it. There are statues of Quan Yin by the kitchen, Sacred Hearts over the door, water goddesses by the spring, and hindu gods in alcoves all over the places, random images of gurus and teachers scattered on every wall and in every room (which were all built by hand over decades of work). And most importantly, people everywhere giving their time and love to maintain a community where you can just be yourself and everyone likes you for it. It is awesome.

I have never felt so happy about giving large amounts of money to the Lama Foundation. When you turn up, their cars are battered beyond recognition, the building are home-made from straw and mud, and they don’t have indoor toilets. Every dollar you donate goes on feeding people who come to visit, to putting on programmes, to supporting the stuff that needs to be done instead of making things look good. Really, go check them out. They want to build a new roof for the main dome complex that will last the next fifty years, go donate!



The Albert Kennedy Trust

1f2eb2c3 8ffe 40c6 ba4b 3a158964ebf4 Cool Charities to Give to in 2011

The Albert Kennedy Trust was founded in 1989 to provide LGBT young people in crisis with accommodation and support. It was named after Albert Kennedy, a 16 year old Mancunian who fell to his death from a car park while trying to flee homophobic bullying.

They regularly have to turn away homeless LGBT teenagers, because they don’t have room to take care of them all. I am not, unfortunately, able to offer foster care because of that whole being-a-student-and-moving-every-year thing, but if you have the time, they’d appreciate that a lot more than money. Although money is also useful…



Re:Vision Drug Policy Network

logo Cool Charities to Give to in 2011

Yep, I’ve donated money to the drugs charity that I helped found. Always be suspicious of the person who won’t put their money where their mouth is, or expect other people to pay for their charitable endeavours.

The Re:Vision Drug Policy Network is a national charity aiming to empower young people to campaign against the war on drugs. The aforementioned “war” is often used to destroy the lives of young people under the bizarre illusion that this will somehow protect them. It’s therefore important that we as young people stand up and say “nuh uh.” We stand for the control and regulation of all drugs – it’s a little ambitious, but we’re confident we can make an impact. We started up in March and are looking to start doing some serious stuff from September. If you don’t have any money, we’ll take your time instead. :)

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

A Joke to Delete For?: Religious Humour and Hypocrisy on Facebook

Tuesday, May 24th, 2011

So, Harold Camping, a small-time Christian preacher told us that the end of the world was coming last Saturday, when 200 million Christians would rise up off the ground and go to heaven while the rest of us mooched around murdering each other until Judgment Day in October sometime.

Pretty much everyone who doesn’t listen to his radio shows found the concept pretty damn funny, lots of people held rapture parties, etc. More serious minded Christians pointed out that the New Testament is pretty clear on the fact that you can’t predict the end of the world by adding some numbers together – Jesus himself says “But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.” (Matt. 24:36). But mostly, we all took the piss. It’s a funny idea.

Come 5pm my time, I posted on a friend’s Facebook Wall, “So, um, you haven’t felt the urge to float upwards at all?” I was expecting some kind of response along the lines, “Oh, Harold Camping is an idiot, something-interesting-about-said-person’s-views-on-eschatology” I was mildly surprised to get the response “fuck off you rude bitch” and then to be promptly deleted as a friend. I was even more surprised to get the response when I asked what he was doing by Facebook message that “you compared me to the lunatic fringes. I am completely fed up with your lack of respect and rudeness. Mocking my faith is completely unnacceptable and reveals you as the hypocrit you are.”

5753599162 4da08a61f5 A Joke to Delete For?: Religious Humour and Hypocrisy on Facebook

Well, look at me, mocking my faith. I'm a hypocrite, natch.

Now, setting aside the comment I could make about someone expressing their frustration with my “rudeness” by telling me to “fuck off you rude bitch” and then calling *me* a hypocrite, I must take issue with these accusations. I am deeply religious, I was well before this person decided to start church shopping, and perhaps my relative confidence in my identity is why I can take criticism of my faith and he can’t. Because take criticism I do, and I have yet to delete anyone for it (except for that one person who started claiming that Hamas had the right to demand the UN teach Holocaust denial in Gazan schools, but that’s less criticism and more anti-semitism).

I’m not a fan of Christianity, I won’t pretend that is not the case. However, the reality is that a lot of people profess Christianity, including some people I love dearly, and if we don’t find a way of politely turning a blind eye to the fact that Christianity itself states it is incompatible with everything else, we end up with crusades and jihads and segregated communities, and I don’t really think that anyone wants that.

But that doesn’t mean pretending that freedom of religion trumps freedom of expression. You have the right to go to church, to take communion, and to really, earnestly, believe that everyone around you is going to hell, and I have the right to call you an idiot and take you to task for corrupting my scriptures. But conversely, I have a right to go to synagogue and believe that God created a world-wide flood several thousand years ago for which there is little to no archaeological evidence and that’s why I can’t work on a Saturday, and you have the right to tell me that I am an idiot and take me to task for that.

Faith is not, and should not be, exempt from scrutiny, humour, criticism, and parody, no more than any other subject which you or I may hold dear, be that politics, family, or relationships. You may call me up on any of my beliefs and, believe me, a lot of people do. To call me a hypocrite for criticising Christianity when I field regular hostile questioning about everything I believe from my wide circle of outspoken atheist friends is simply to misunderstand what that word means.

5753054713 9c6562c488 A Joke to Delete For?: Religious Humour and Hypocrisy on Facebook

Sometimes a good dose of satire is what we all need to gain perspective.

Although I got deleted, a few friends commented on the wallpost saying that he had overreacted somewhat. In response, this person wrote “that is like writing “looking forward to your 72 virgins?” on a muslims wall when there is a terrorist attack. completely unnacceptable.” Indeed, writing such a thing would be completely unacceptable. Making an insensitive and tactless joke following a highly emotive tragedy, however, is not exactly analogous to making a knowing joke following a mildly embarrassing incident by someone else to whom the recipient has a link. An actual analogy to the 72 virgins comment would be writing “I’m planning to start a bakery and I hear you have some ovens going spare?” on my wall on Holocaust Memorial Day, or “What’s the difference between Jesus and a painting? It takes only one nail to hang a painting!” on a Christian’s wall on Good Friday. Those are just lame and offensive.

A much more appropriate comparison would be posting on my wall, “so, how can I serve you, O overlady?” the day after Ovadia Yosef, a respected but ultra-Orthodox/Haredi rabbi, delivered a sermon in which he said that the sole purpose of non-Jews was to serve Jews. I can tell you now that my reaction would not have been “fuck off” but “lol, yeah, bit embarrassing, that guy…”, maybe do a little debunking if I felt like it. Telling someone that they’re a “rude bitch”? Perhaps not. An (atheist) friend who does Physics noted that an analogy for him would be “if someone asked me how the search for those 7 extra dimensions was doing”. You can’t disavow members of your own community, but you can fail to defend them when they do something demonstrably stupid, and dare I say it, you can take a joke aimed at them in good humour. Such has been the reaction of most Christians I have spoken to about Harold Camping, because of course I didn’t single out this person for my “abuse”, as I am sure he would like to believe.

5753654702 d3ca83ce7a A Joke to Delete For?: Religious Humour and Hypocrisy on Facebook

Swearing always makes you seem more Godly. ...right?

I’m pretty sure that this person, whom a few friends have seen since and he seems somewhat embarrassed about this entire episode, wants to believe that he is persecuted for his faith, as he further commented that I deemed his “”Christian views towards forgiveness” (paraphrase) as “anti-woman.”". I was genuinely saddened by that one, because I said no such thing. In a Facebook post I had made on a book extract by a woman who had had her rapist jailed twenty years after he and two of his friends had drugged and raped her at a party, I had actually said that his accusing a woman he had never met of lying about her trauma after rape was sexist. (No, I’m actually not making that up. He wrote “just because someone is a rape victim, it doesn’t mean she is a portal to objective truth, her claims must be subject to the same scrutiny as his … Her attempts to belittle his ‘spiritual awakening’ indicated to me someone who doesn’t comprehend the depths that a person can change.”) I then said that his motivations for accusing her of such a thing derived from his Christian convictions, which were blinding him to the facts actually presented in the article.

There are some very interesting analyses out there to say that Christian attitudes towards forgiveness *are* anti-woman (because some denominations encourage women to stay silent about rape, assault and other abuse in the name of “forgiving” their attacker, who are often fellow Christians – the Amish are especially bad for this). However, that really wasn’t the point, and I have no desire to promote or develop such ideas further – forgiveness is important for any traumatic event committed by or against you, but it’s not an excuse for inaction. If someone cannot recognise that refusing a woman justice after rape because her attacker wrote her an insincere letter saying sorry, then they cannot recognise how they are perpetuating a blame culture in which women are expected to just deal with men’s “uncontrollable” desires and consequent begrudging apologies. And that is really just sad for all of us who have to keep living in the world that culture creates.

I’m really not kidding that not actively batting down excuses for rapists encourages rape, and I think that it is deeply hypocritical to claim that Christianity is the most moral and true religion while advocating policies that I cannot help but see as actively immoral. Allow me to demonstrate this and quote a good article entitled, “Feminism 101: Helpful Hints for Dudes, Part 3

A lot of people accuse feminists of thinking that all men are rapists. That’s not true. But do you know who think all men are rapists?

Rapists do.

They really do. In psychological study, the profiling, the studies, it comes out again and again.

Virtually all rapists genuinely believe that all men rape, and other men just keep it hushed up better. And more, these people who really are rapists are constantly reaffirmed in their belief about the rest of mankind being rapists like them by things like rape jokes, that dismiss and normalize the idea of rape.

If one in twenty guys (or more) is a real and true rapist, and you have any amount of social activity with other guys like yourself, then it is almost a statistical certainty that one time hanging out with friends and their friends, playing Halo with a bunch of guys online, in a WoW guild, in a pick-up game of basketball, at a bar, or elsewhere, you were talking to a rapist. Not your fault. You can’t tell a rapist apart any better than anyone else can. It’s not like they announce themselves.

But, here’s the thing. It’s very likely that in some of these interactions with these guys, at some point or another, someone told a rape joke. You, decent guy that you are, understood that they didn’t mean it, and it was just a joke. And so you laughed.

Or maybe you didn’t laugh. Maybe it just wasn’t a very funny joke. So maybe you just didn’t say anything at all.

And, decent guy who would never condone rape, who would step in and stop rape if he saw it, who understands that rape is awful and wrong and bad, when you laughed? When you were silent?

That rapist who was in the group with you, that rapist thought that you were on his side. That rapist knew that you were a rapist like him. And he felt validated, and he felt he was among his comrades.

You. The rapist’s comrade.

5753654596 b7d9375991 A Joke to Delete For?: Religious Humour and Hypocrisy on Facebook

No-one asks to be raped. No-one is to blame for being raped.

I’m not sorry for making a joke about religion, and I simply don’t have sympathy for people who accuse me of being abusive in abusive messages. I am very grateful that I live in a relatively free society devoid of theocracy, and I’m glad the worst I have to fear is being deleted from Facebook rather than having my head cut off. I think it is a moral imperative for anyone religious who cares about the dignity of the human condition to call sexists sexist when they’re being sexist, regardless of how much it upsets them, because, maybe, one day, they’ll stop. “The most revolutionary thing one can do is always to proclaim loudly what is happening.”

The greatest irony, of course, is that someone who demanded that I forgive an unrepentant rapist apparently couldn’t find it in his heart to forgive me for my “sin”. But I think I can forgive him for that…

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

5753054887 468fe11799 A Joke to Delete For?: Religious Humour and Hypocrisy on Facebook

Related Posts:

The 30 Day Song Challenge No. 21-30

Thursday, March 17th, 2011

So, the 30 Day Song Challenge is sweeping Facebook at the moment, and as with many of my friends, I spent a spare few hours pondering such existential questions as “But what song defines *me* as a person?” and “What does *guilt* really mean in this context?”. From this, the list below was produced. There’s more than 30 songs, I didn’t do it in thirty days, whether a Wii game counts as a song is rather dubious, but it was definitely a challenge. And here’s (what I consider to be) some ace music.

This article is in three parts, and the first part is here, and the second here.

day 21 – a song that you listen to when you’re happy

This makes me so happy. How can you listen to Poppi Holla by Chincane and not be even more happy?!

day 22 – a song that you listen to when you’re sad

When I am down, Cher lifts me up. This is a Song for the Lonely, don’t you know.

day 23 – a song that you want to play at your wedding

Voodoo Child by Rogue Trader. Because I did play it at my wedding, and it was awesome.

– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WG2w1k1_BZ4

day 24 – a song that you want to play at your funeral

Linkin Park again, Leave Out All the Rest. See, they have a song for every eventuality! Sod off, music fascists.

day 25 – a song that makes you laugh

Being a Dickhead’s Cool is funny, mainly because I know so many people who are actually a “part time blogger with my own jewellery line, which is a mix of religious iconography, kinda with a Saved by the Bell vibe?” Lols.

– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVmmYMwFj1I

day 26 – a song that you can play on an instrument

Dunno if the Nintendo Wii counts as an instrument, but in Rhythm Parade, the music only continues if you hit all the right buttons in sequence, so I guess it kinda counts. I LOVE marching bands, so this is really fun to do, if hard – took me six hours to get a perfect score on the Advanced level.

day 27 – a song that you wish you could play

I did in fact briefly download the sheet music to this song, but while A Thousand Miles by Vanessa Carlton is beautiful and mellifluous, I am dyslexic and never made it past my first term’s worth of piano lessons. A doomed dream, I think.

day 28 – a song that makes you feel guilty

This is Your Life, asks Switchfoot, are you who you want to be? NOOOOOOOOO, argh, must be more productive and useful as a human being. *guilt guilt guilt*

day 29 – a song from your childhood

When I was growing up, I listened to three things: Queen, Flanders and Swann, and the Joseph and the Technicolour Dreamcoat soundtrack. They were just the cassettes my mum had around at the time, so I ended up with a very odd childhood mainly filled with rock, folk music, and the odd tape about The Snowman that came with Tetley teabags. Hammer to Fall is one of Queen’s best.

day 30 – your favorite song at this time last year

My introduction to Lady Gaga’s Poker Face was as I was walking to a lecture and heard someone playing it very loudly in their car. It took some garbled half-sung rendering of it to a friend a few hours later to work out what the hell it was (being completely unable to identify the “Poker Face” of the song and mishearing it as “[indeterminate garbling] ger faith”) and then a new love with born.

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

The 30 Day Song Challenge No. 11-20

Wednesday, March 16th, 2011

So, the 30 Day Song Challenge is sweeping Facebook at the moment, and as with many of my friends, I spent a spare few hours pondering such existential questions as “But what song defines *me* as a person?” and “What does *guilt* really mean in this context?”. From this, the list below was produced. There’s more than 30 songs, I didn’t do it in thirty days, whether a Wii game counts as a song is rather dubious, but it was definitely a challenge. And here’s (what I consider to be) some ace music.

This article is in three parts, and the third part will be published tomorrow. The first part is here.

day 11 – a song from your favorite band

Linkin Park seems to be one of the few bands it is acceptable for me to say I like, which I am relieved by, given they are the only band who I have loved every album from. Here’s Somewhere I Belong.

day 12 – a song from a band you hate

I hate Metallica for their attitude to copyright, but The Memory Remains is nonetheless a good track. As long as it’s live. The music video with the scary woman with the organ is really disconcerting.

day 13 – a song that is a guilty pleasure

Tune.

day 14 – a song that no one would expect you to love

Back before Youtube, when I used Yahoo Launch Music Player for my “Yahoo music experience”, I ended listening to a hell of a lot of country. Pretty much every American has heard of Toby Keith, but he’s almost entirely unknown outside of the US. Nights I Can’t Remember, Friends I’ll Never Forget is pretty typical.

day 15 – a song that describes you

It’s always phenomenally hard to think of anything that sums you up as an individual, let alone a song which was never intended to have anything to do with you. Gone by Switchfoot, however, is about getting on and doing something with your life because breath you take is a breath closer to the day you die (that the something you’re supposed to be doing is accepting Jesus into your heart is something we will set aside briefly). And as the thought that I am going to die before I get anything done is my primary motivation in life, I thought this song probably fitted best.

day 16 – a song that you used to love but now hate

It’s biphobic, but dammit, I Kissed a Girl by Katy Perry is catchy. Took a while to get out of my head.

day 17 – a song that you hear often on the radio

For a track that came out two years ago, Photograph by Nickleback is a remarkably resilient song.

day 18 – a song that you wish you heard on the radio

I did hear Slam by Pendulum, once, on the radio. The DJ was taking requests and it was a very odd day. Should totally play it more though.

day 19 – a song from your favorite album

Linkin Park again. You know why? Cos they’re awesome. And Breaking the Habit is the best track on Meteora.

day 20 – a song that you listen to when you’re angry

I went through this period when I listened to Rooftops by Lost Prophets and I Hate Everything About You by Three Days Grace very loudly whenever I was angry. The wall of sound was surprisingly effective as calming you down. As of last August however, when I listened to Let You Go by Chase and Status about 30 times in a row in a day, this has definitely taken over as my “ARGH!!” song of choice.



Tune in tomorrow for songs 21-30.

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

The 30 Day Song Challenge No. 1-10

Tuesday, March 15th, 2011

So, the 30 Day Song Challenge is sweeping Facebook at the moment, and as with many of my friends, I spent a spare few hours pondering such existential questions as “But what song defines *me* as a person?” and “What does *guilt* really mean in this context?”. From this, the list below was produced. There’s more than 30 songs, I didn’t do it in thirty days, whether a Wii game counts as a song is rather dubious, but it was definitely a challenge. And here’s (what I consider to be) some ace music.

This article is in three parts, and the second part will be published tomorrow.

day 01 – your favorite song

It was a cold, clear night in Bradford when I first heard DJ Tiesto’s remix of Adagio for Strings by Barber. And I kinda hated it for bastardising what I considered to be a truly epic game soundtrack. Then I went and listened to it again a few days later and got obsessed. Since then I have listened to it hundreds of times and it just doesn’t get old.

day 02 – your least favorite song

I hate Travis’ Why Does It Always Rain On Me sufficiently that I refused to listen to it when trying to find a Youtube recording. Apologies therefore, if you get rickrolled. Setting aside the fact that the lyrics are nonsensical and the lead singer couldn’t sound more bored if he tried, the last sentence of the chorus missing off the final “me” drives me in a mental open loop of absolute craziness every time. JUST SAY ME.

day 03 – a song that makes you happy

Yay, it’s a really nice happy song about how much the singer loves his family. Yay.

day 04 – a song that makes you sad

Martina McBride has a very beautiful voice, and some powerful lyrics to an equally powerful video about domestic violence and child abuse. It makes me miserable every time I watch though, so I try not to do it very often.

day 05 – a song that reminds you of someone

Sam O’Connor. 2009. Vodka. Nuff said.

John Barrowman is a meanie and won’t let me embed his music videos. :(

day 06 – a song that reminds you of somewhere

In October 2006, I was sitting in my step-dad’s car waiting to go to my admissions interview at the University of Cambridge. An extremely bad quality rendition of Fallout Boy’s This Ain’t a Scene crackled down the radio, but I got the point. Unfortunately I couldn’t explain the motivations behind 19th century spiritual movements adequately, and I ended up at the University of Manchester instead. But I got a great song and a hell of a life of activism instead of studying, so I guess it worked out.

day 07 – a song that reminds you of a certain event

I cannot go into detail about what event made the Lloyds TSB Dubstep Remix significant to me, though you may be able to guess from the genre, but suffice to say it was a very odd evening. Definitely at its best played at 5am with bass speakers in student halls though.

day 08 – a song that you know all the words to

Dating back to the days when I was obsessed with Bowling for Soup and they hadn’t deteriorated after A Hangover You Don’t Deserve, Girl All the Bad Guys Want is (along with the Gas Man Cometh by Flanders and Swann) the only track that I can remember the entire lyrics, tune, and musical breaks to.

day 09 – a song that you can dance to

Brighton, 2008, Legends, Bradford LGBT Big Gay Roadtrip. We got Low. :D

day 10 – a song that makes you fall asleep

I assume that by this is mean “a song you can fall asleep to”, but My World by Avril Lavigne does actually have the power to send me to sleep. By sheer historical accident, but one which I would imagine many would find intensely ironic, I happened to buy Avril Lavigne’s Let Go album at the same time as having a massive bout of insomnia. As the type of music fan that tends to play the same music over and over again for a month before moving onto something else, it became a habit to play all the way through as I was trying to fall asleep. Several weeks of Pavlovian training later, I now cannot listen to any song on the album with suddenly feeling very sleepy…

Tune in tomorrow for songs 11-20.

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

Elect Tabz for Comms Officer by watching her LEGO stop-motion video!

Monday, February 28th, 2011

Hello everyone,

I would say that it was mildly parochial to link to a campaigns video for an election that is taking place at my university (that UMSU students can vote in on 8th-10th March, from your student portal. :P), but as

a) it’s made out of LEGO,
b) its features probably the world’s only depiction of a police kettle made out of LEGO,
c) it’s pretty damn funny,

I thought I would share it here. :)

And check out the comic book manifesto!

God, if only all student election campaigns were this pretty.

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

SarahMcCulloch.com is 1 Year Old Today!

Wednesday, January 5th, 2011

Seems like just yesterday I went, “Ooh, look, I have a website!” It’s been a year now and I now have 70 or so webpages and 70 blogposts. Calloo callay! I will be celebrating by doing something silly in Chelmsford in the afternoon. Give me a bell if you want to join in. :)

To recognise the auspices of this most exciting day, I have jazzed up some parts of my website. My activism page has been newly updated with new stuff in the world you should care about, and my media page has been rewritten to look nicer, with new content added from before uni. I will be trying to keep on it from now on. Not that you care, but hey, it looks nice. :D

Stats!

* 261,300 people have visited SarahMcCulloch.com since it went live.
* 18,709 people visited in one day, on June 1, 2010 (I was linked to by one of those Facebook pages that made you join to see something interesting).
* 180 countries have sent visitors my way, including Palestine (5), Cuba (3), and Zimbabwe (2).
* The United States sent the most visitors (85,664), followed by Poland (37,703), and then the UK (30,907).
* The top search term is “Sarah McCulloch“.

Until next year. :D

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 4: Other Parties Helped Them!

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

This blogpost is the last part of a four part series.

ScottishLiberalDemocratsNoEntry Stornoway Scotland 20100407 Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 4: Other Parties Helped Them!

Liberal Democrat polling is at its worst for 13 years.

I have now devoted some 4000 words to why I have left the Liberal Democrats and how the coalition government is literally a matter of life and death for some people. The response I have had from my decision has been massive, but a significant part of it has been suggestions of other parties that I might be interested in joining. So I thought I would write a little bit on why I don’t think that is a good idea.

For all that I have said previously, I’m not going to say that there aren’t things I do quite like about the Coalition over their predecessors. The scrapping of the National Identity Register (though not for foreign nationals…). The scrapping of ContactPoint. Supporting the autonomy of home educators. Not spending £800 on a Christmas tree. Telling the EU to get stuffed when it asks for more money. That’s cool.

But do you remember the part where people are going to die…? Is a higher personal tax threshold really worth the increased poverty of millions? Please, coalition supporters, tell me how you can live with yourselves, because I am stumped. Would I give up my £700 a year to keep my friends with mental health issues on community support programmes and out of psychiatric wards, hospitals and graveyards? I’d give it up in seconds.

Many people have suggested that I join the Labour Party. Several of my friends have now done so in the wake of the election and the black-haired Mr. Milband taking the leadership. However, to those who seem to think that the Labour Party will save us all from the clutches of the scissor-wielding George Osborne, I can say only one thing: have you forgotten?

1333743 Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 4: Other Parties Helped Them!

A tank burns after a ambush in Iraq.

Have you forgotten Iraq, death of David Kelly, the millions of Iraqi dead, the protests of a million people ignored? Have you forgotten 90 day detention, 42 day detention, detention without trial, control orders, extraordinary rendition? The National Identity Register, the ContactPoint database, the Forward Intelligence Team, the Independant Safeguarding Authority, NHS spine? Tuition fees, academies, the slow but steady abolition of special schools? The expansion of prisons, prison sentences, and reactive legislation (Labour created one new offence a day, every day, for 13 years)? The privatisation of everything they could possibly justify, including health, transport, education, and the post office? The handover of sovereignty of Europe and refusal to hold a referendum that they promised us? The emphasis on political expediency over evidence-based policy (drug policy, introduction of “alternative therapies” on the NHS)? That whole deregulation of the banking sector thing?

Striking postmen at the Royal Mail Bowthorpe depot in 2009 Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 4: Other Parties Helped Them!

What has happened that no-one found it odd that the post office union had to strike under a Labour government in order to protect their jobs and prevent privatisation?

Have you forgotten just why Labour lost its majority? It’s because they did the Tories’ work for them. How can anyone tell me that Labour are the answer when they were the problem until May this year? Do you seriously believe that a man who has been at the heart of government since 1997 and who has a cabinet made up of people *responsible* for the creation and implementation of these policies are suddenly going to become lovely, fluffy social democrats without a war-mongering, authoritarian, privatising bone in their body? I don’t think so. People tell me to join the Labour Party – I can only reply that they have very, very short memories.

green party utah Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 4: Other Parties Helped Them!

Hi! Vote green for fiscal irresponsibility based on middle-class outrage!

People who want me to join the Green Party, however, are assuming that what I am looking for is an even whiter, even more middle class organisation. But while I care about the environment, I’m not prepared to deal with “the welfare problem” by putting everyone on it, giving everyone in the country £5000 a year and shutting down all private alternatives to public services. Here be authoritarian paternalism… The Green Party’s major priority seems to be, not spreading their message or persuading others of their policies, but getting the voting system reformed so their party can get more people elected. Somehow, I find that rather suspect. And what is up with that banning stem stell research thing?

986B9666 A578 D4BB 3C8CEFF3BE0DDF03 Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 4: Other Parties Helped Them!

Brian from the CPGB tries to explain why supporting war credits in Germany in 1914 is *crucial* to current revolutionary struggles...

I’m not joining any of the spectrum of the right wing parties on account of the fact that they are cheerleading on the kinds of policies that made me quit the Liberal Democrats in the first place. Been there, done that, sold out people worse off than myself. The left-wing parties I think are more thoughtful, but useless. I appreciate that socialists and communists are fundamentally concerned with human beings rather than money, but on the other hand I have far better things to do with my time than argue over the shades of theories of documents written in 1926 (you think I’m kidding…). No revolutionary system can be that detailed because no-one’s going to agree to implement it.

As for me, I think I am largely done with party politics now. But right now I’m pretty open-minded on where I go next, so feel free to leave a comment if you adhere to a brand of politics worth looking into. And by that, I mean one that doesn’t shrug at the potential death toll of thousands of people in favour of some vague idea of “fairness” that stops being meaningful the second you have the chance to do something about it.

See also:

Who’s Affected by the Cuts?: Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 3

Death to the Liberal Democrats! Or, Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 1

What’s Affected by the Cuts?: Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 2

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

Who’s Affected by the Cuts?: Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 3

Monday, October 25th, 2010

This blogpost is the third of a four part series, and the fourth part will be published tomorrow.

So, my friends, we established yesterday that the systems are going to be taking something of a hit as a result of coalition government. What about the people who depend on the state? What has the coalition government got in store for them?

By the way, I was going to cover students as well, but a) they aren’t at risk of death, tuition fees just piss me off and b), this article is long already. So it’s just the elderly and disabled being murdered today. But frankly, I think that’s horrendous enough really. See my analysis of the Browne Review on tuition fees if you are especially interested.

Who wants to support disabled people? Why can’t they just get a job?

Disablemarker Whos Affected by the Cuts?: Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 3

A floor marker for people with disabilities.

People with severe impairments or disabilities are rarely able to live without government support. 3/4 of disabled people live below the poverty line (which is a meaningless statistic in reality given the way the poverty line is calculated but should give you some idea of how much disabled people are disadvantaged in society currently, let alone in the near future). Changes that affect disabled people specifically are:

“‘Time limiting contributory Employment Support Allowance for those in the Work Related Activity Group to one year. This is aimed to cut £2 billion a year by 2014-15.’

Disabled people will be subject to an arbitrary cut off point of a year. After that, whatever their circumstances, they will not get any ESA income. This will be in the context of sharply increasing unemployment and while entrenched discriminatory barriers to employment remain in place, and indeed will probably grow as a result of the overall impact of the government’s policy.

Nearly a million people may lose ESA worth £91.40 a week as a result.”

Now, maybe you think that £90 is pretty high, but it’s really not if you have personal assistants to pay for and extra travel costs. Worse:

“This change will apply side by side with the government’s reassessment of all Incapacity Benefit/ESA claimants. People ‘assessed as fully capable for work will be moved onto Jobseekers’ Allowance.”

Now, what they actually mean by “assessing” people is that they won’t trust your doctor anymore to assess themselves, but make you turn up on a specific day to see an assessor specially trained to certify as many people as non-disabled as possible. So if you have crippling arthritis which comes and goes, but which makes it impossible to hold down a job for the long-term, and your assessment date falls on a day when you can walk and open doors, the government will not be sympathetic. If you have blinding, searing headaches that make it impossible to concentrate for more than a few hours, they will not know nor care. This isn’t being a doomsday preaching, by the way, it’s what happens now:

“the ESA assessment process itself has been strongly criticised as being overly harsh and very badly designed. Many people are being wrongly denied ESA entirely or placed in the ‘work related activity’ group. This includes people receiving chemotherapy, whom the government claims are protected by guidelines.” Link.

Yes, people receiving chemotherapy are “fit for work”. I have, in fact, had an argument with someone who seriously argued that people with non-terminal cancer receiving chemotherapy are perfectly fit to work independantly. He was, unsurprisingly, a member of the Conservative Party. I’m glad he made an allowance for people with terminal cancer.

Moving on from work, what about disabled people who can’t work at all? What are they up to? Have a story:

“”Page 69 of the spending review explains that because of “the urgent need to tackle the culture of welfare dependency”, people in residential care will lose the mobility component of the disability living allowance in 18 months time.

My mother-in-law, Margaret, is 87 and had polio in 1953. She served as a Wren in the war and brought up her family from a wheelchair. She and my father-in-law worked tirelessly for the British Polio Fellowship. She moved in with us when she was widowed 23 years ago and was grittily determined to remain at home as long as possible. But her disability caught up with her and a year ago she had to move into a nursing home.

The one thing that has made this bearable for us all is that the mobility component of the DLA enables her to lease a wheelchair-adapted vehicle through the Motability scheme. So she can come home and join her family for lunch, can be taken on holiday or to the shops, to weddings and funerals, to celebrations and special occasions. She has been able remain part of the community and at the heart of her family. Without this specially adapted vehicle, she cannot travel.

If she loses her mobility allowance, her car goes with it and she will be stranded in the nursing home. This will have a catastrophic effect on the quality of her life, quite out of proportion with the amount of money it will save the country.” Link

Honestly, this doesn’t even begin to cover the many ways the disabled population is about to be penalised for being disabled. If these cuts go through, thousands of people who currently claim disability support from the government are going to be stranded. Some will be prevented from working at all, others will be trapped in their own homes unable to leave. Some will die. What does Inclusion London have to say about this?

“We reject George Osborne’s claim that these cuts are either fair or unavoidable. The spending plans represent a choice: a choice to make disabled people and others who are among the poorest in society, already facing enormous discrimination and inequality, pay for an approach to deficit reduction which is riddled with the risk of creating a double dip recession.”

Yeah, biatch.

Hey, elderly frail people! Get a job!

Elderly Couple   Brasov   Romania Whos Affected by the Cuts?: Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 3

An elderly couple. In Romania.

As people get older, our bodies age so that we find it harder to move about. It becomes harder to judge distances, to react quickly to danger, and to recover from illness and injury. I’m 21 years old and I know this. The government, despite being run by older white men considerably closer to death than I, does not, it would seem:

“[The Comprehensive Spending Review] calls into question the ability of councils to deliver simpler and relatively inexpensive interventions – a grab rail in a bathroom, for instance – that can make the difference between an elderly person continuing to live independently or falling and ending up in a care home.

In fact, social care generally is being cut by 30% over the next three years. Even the government’s usual suggestion of charging people is redundant here (even if people could pay):

“On the level of charges, average means-tested rates for home care are already of the order of £8-£10 an hour. Some councils are contemplating increases of as much as 50% in the hourly rate and/or the maximum weekly payment. But the hard truth is that a 40% cut in funding would be almost £6bn: at present, social care charges of all kinds bring in a total £2.2bn.”

Of course, you could just not provide home care for the elderly. Charities and families will fill the gap, won’t they? Elderly people will be fine. The government will save money, won’t it? That’s all it’s really about, isn’t it? Isn’t it?

“We recognise that councils are between a rock and a hard place,” said Stephen Burke, chief executive of Counsel and Care, which specialises in information and advice for elderly people and their carers. “But cutting access to care and supporting fewer older people will only cost more in the long run. Older people will be left to struggle on their own and more will end up being admitted to expensive and often inappropriate hospital and residential care.”

“This will be the key. With up to 40% of elderly people in hospital beds placed there unnecessarily, and as many as 70% staying too long, there is a huge incentive for the NHS to use its supposedly protected funds to help out social care in its hour of need.” Link

Duly costing the government a fortune in care for the people who make it to the hospital, and costing numerous elderly people their lives and their dignity as their support is withdrawn and they are left to fend for themselves. What do you do if you can’t get out of bed yourself? What do you do if your arthritis is so bad you can’t call for help? This is so obvious and so dangerous (and expensive) it seems hard to believe that no-one in the government stopped to think about it.

Finally, have you ever wondered why the government keeps saying that the cuts are progressive? What are they basing that on?

“The BBC’s Stephanie Flanders points out that the government’s analysis ‘excludes a third of the benefit changes planned by the government and does not go up to 2014-15. The changes excluded by this are clearly regressive – they have the greatest effect, relative to income, on people at the lower end of the income scale.” Link.

…sneaky. One does wonder if fiddling the statistics is how Nick Clegg comforts himself at night.

Several people have argued to me that the best response to the coalition government is to join the Labour Party. Tomorrow’s post will therefore point why that’s a short-sighted idea. Join me then. Don’t join the Labour Party. :)

See also:

Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 4: Other Parties Helped Them!

Who’s Affected by the Cuts?: Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 3

What’s Affected by the Cuts?: Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 2

Death to the Liberal Democrats! Or, Why the Coalition is Going to Kill People Part 1

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts: