Archive for the ‘Articles’ Category

20 Funny Street Names

Tuesday, January 25th, 2011

504958559 6330a6be31 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

161596016 b7f38085ff 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

956942380 8d1bee72f6 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

315251140 04210601 20 Funny Street Names

264772760 04214239 20 Funny Street Names

314822740 04210605 20 Funny Street Names

316457920 04210630 20 Funny Street Names

316309620 04210710 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

Most bizarre street names 8 20 Funny Street Names

Most bizarre street names 14 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

DSC09124 thumb 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

105887115 bc6b4e57cc m 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

442491485 50c8344e6b 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

247px ACDC Lane 20 Funny Street Names

ACDC Lane is a street in Melbourne, Victoria. The street was formerly called Corporation Lane, but was renamed on 1 October 2004 as a tribute to Australian rock band AC/DC. The Melbourne City Council’s vote to rename the street was unanimous. The trademark lightning bolt or slash (“/”) used to separate the AC and the DC in the band’s name contravened the naming policy of the Office of the Registrar of Geographic Names, so the punctuation was omitted on the street sign.

Link.

longest town names 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

4717116125 92c72930c9 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

190454616 fafcca46e6 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

4026455106 f730a36937 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

3689968909 0ea67f0ed8 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

278608072 6366dd0c8f 20 Funny Street Names

Link.

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

Mephedrone 101 – Common Questions and Answers

Wednesday, November 17th, 2010

I get a reasonable amount of search engine traffic to my blog, and one of the most popular cluster of search terms that people search for is on mephedrone (the others being: cool charities, homosexuality and Bah’ai, homosexuality and Sikhism, Christopher Hitchens, and an endless variety of angsty questions about police raids.) None of the articles in which I have referred to mephedrone have really dealt with the issues that people were looking for, so I thought I would be quite helpful and post some of the more common questions with their common answers. :)

4mmc Mephedrone 101   Common Questions and Answers

Impounded illegal mephedrone

Can you still buy mephedrone online?

No, you cannot buy mephedrone online. The reason it used to be so easy to get hold of was because it was legal to manufacture, sell and possess. Mephedrone is illegal now in most Western countries, and consequently all websites that used to sell it openly have been shut down or are “down for maintenance”.

What shops sell mephedrone? Where can I buy mephedrone in Manchester or the UK?

No shop in the Western world will openly sell mephedrone. Mephedrone is now in the same class of illegal drugs as MDMA, cannabis, and ketamine, and is therefore obtained through the same channels.

How is mephedrone made? How was mephedrone produced?

The chemical details are here, but I suspect the latter question referred to the supply chain involved. Essentially factories in Asian countries, but particularly China, will produce any research chemical in industrial quantities on demand. As mephedrone was legal and had a phenomenal mark-up with no ramifications, certain entrepreneurial souls started up wholesaler websites and let people know they were around. And it went from there. You can read more about a dealer’s perspective here.

How much mephedrone should you take? What is the dosage of mephedrone? How can you increase the high of mephedrone?

Erowid has the answers to correct dosage and usage in its vault entry for mephedrone.

Is mephedrone MDMA? Can you turn mephedrone into MDMA? Can you buy mephedrone and get MDMA instead?

Mephedrone and MDMA are two closely related but completely different drugs. Mephedrone’s effects are less intense than that of MDMA, shorter-acting, and usage patterns tend to be similar to people who use ketamine or cannabis than LSD or heroin (i.e. smaller, more frequent hits that you can control, over drugs that once you take them, you are high until you come back down again). I am no chemist, but as far as I am aware, you cannot synthesise mephedrone into MDMA or vice versa. MDMA is in considerably higher demand than mephedrone and has a much higher profit margin, so the likelihood that you can buy mephedrone and actually be sold MDMA of any significant quality is pretty low.

Is mephedrone safe? Does mephedrone harm you? What is mephedrone being cut with? How does mephedrone kill you? Haven’t people died using mephedrone?

Taking pure mephedrone won’t kill you if you use it sensibly, but I wouldn’t say it was “safe”, no. It’s kinda hard to tell what the long-term health effects of mephedrone actually are because the government went and banned it before anyone could do any substantive research on the drug, but from what I’ve read, it appears to be corrosive. One user told a Guardian journalist that he left a spoon in a bag of mephedrone for 72 hours and when he came back, the spoon had been partially dissolved. So if you take a lot over a long period of time, your sinuses, oesophagus and lungs will not be very happy.

However, mephedrone doesn’t kill you in itself – like all stimulants, if you have pre-existing heart conditions, take a massive dose, or don’t take care of yourself while high by monitoring your water intake and body temperature, then you may well end up with serious health problems, be they heart attacks, heatstroke, dehydration, or anything else. This is not the fault of the drug. Almost all deaths that have been linked to mephedrone have involved polydrug use: i.e. mephedrone and alcohol, mephedrone and cocaine, etc. If you ingest two separate drugs, they will interact in ways that may be be better or worse for you (for example, MDMA and LSD apparently produces a trip that is signicantly intenser and more euphoric than either drug on its own – but cocaine and alcohol combine in your stomach to create a different drug which is potentially lethal) – if you are going to use drugs, do your research first and stay safe.

What other legal highs are there after mephedrone? What drugs are similar to mephedrone? What about ivory wave and mephedrone?

A number of legal research chemicals have been available online since mephedrone was banned, notably NRG-1 and ivory wave, but none has really taken hold – when drugs are still predominantly being referred to by their chemical names rather than their street names, only the psychonauts and the adventurous are really using them.

Mephedrone is not the same as ivory wave, NRG-1, or MDAT. No-one really knows what ivory wave is at the moment, because it hasn’t become widely available enough yet to be subject to proper sampling. However, a lot of ivory wave seems to contain MDPV, a cathinone that is similar to mephedrone but not quite. Ivory wave is currently legal, but doesn’t sound very nice on the system.

Mephedrone is a cathinone, so chemically it is similar to methylone, methadrone, and MDPV, which hold varying legality across the world. But to be honest, if you’re looking for a stimulant that’s similar to mephedrone and has decades of research into its long-term effects and safer usage, MDMA is going to be much healthier for you than unknown research chemicals.

500px Map of european countries where mephedrone is illegal.svg Mephedrone 101   Common Questions and Answers

Map of Europe showing countries where mephedrone is illegal, correct as of August 2010

Random search terms:

uk mephedrone post ban
– You can still get it in Britain, it’s just now £20 a gram and not very safe.

mephedrone class uk law
- In the UK, mephedrone is currently a Class B drug. Personal possession of mephedrone could get you three months in prison or a £2500 fine, and supply is six months in prison or a £5000 fine.

structure of mephedrone
- The chemical structure and synthesis of mephedrone is available on Wikipedia here. Here is an image:

Mephedrone 2D skeletal Mephedrone 101   Common Questions and Answers

Chemical Structure of Mephedrone

mephedrone precursor
- The main precursor to mephedrone is 4-methylpropiophenone, which as far as I am aware is still legal.

what was mephedrone designed for
- The drug was actually first synthesised in 1929, but rediscovered in 2003 by chemists looking to manufacture a “designer drug” that could get round existing drugs legislation. I’m not sure where the “plant food” thing came from. If you put mephedrone on your plants, they will die.

where has all the mephedrone gone?
- The majority of mephedrone production was in China; when mephedrone became incredibly popular, the Chinese government cracked down on the production of one of the precursors of mephedrone, and consequently the industrial quantities of mephedrone that used to float around have now disappeared. Because mephedrone is now illegal in much of the Western world, its production and supply has gone the way of other illegal drugs and it is consequently not being openly waved around in bags at house parties anymore.

which is more harmful mephedrone or cocaine
- We cannot know that until a lot more research is done into mephedrone, its long-term effects and its social harms. Chemically, mephedrone is probably worse for your body, but mephedrone has never induced the levels of aggressiveness and violence that cocaine produces in its users. We await more data.

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

“The Chemists are Winning”: The Rise of Mephedrone and Legal Highs

Monday, October 4th, 2010

Originally written for Student Direct.

In April 2010, after a media storm, the British government passed legislation to classify mephedrone as a Class B drug. Mephedrone is a stimulant somewhat similar in effects to MDMA and cocaine, and is chemically based on cathinones found in the African stimulant Khat, but which was sufficiently chemically different to not have been previously included under the Misuse of Drugs Act, which regulated drugs in the UK. The drug was actually first synthesised in 1929, but rediscovered in 2003 by chemists looking to manufacture a “designer drug” that could get round existing drugs legislation.

Mephedrone 2D skeletal The Chemists are Winning: The Rise of Mephedrone and Legal Highs

Chemical Structure of Mephedrone

Mephedrone first started hitting the news in late 2009, but the scare-mongering grew and by early 2010, the papers were full of tales of people who had allegedly become addicted to the drug, with The Sun even publishing a story detailing how a man had ripped off his own scrotum under the influence of mephedrone (which later turned out to have been an internet hoax taken seriously). The General Secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers called for a ban after two teenagers in Scunthorpe died after allegedly taking the drug. After the ban, the coroners’ report for the two discovered that neither had taken mephedrone and they had, in fact, been out drinking alcohol the night they died, and subsequent studies have determined that, of the dozens of deaths “linked” to mephedrone worldwide, only two have ever been conclusively proven to have actually involved mephedrone as a cause of death – but the media wasn’t going to let facts get in the way of a campaign against this “deadly killer”.

What with all free publicity for mephedrone and so many stories reporting how fun and cheap it was, use soared. It suddenly became very hard to not buy mephedrone. One Students for Sensible Drug Policy activist visited a headshop in three different occasions in the first half of 2010 and was offered “Meow-meow” every time, whether she was looking for stimulants, psychedelics or even just rolling papers. Mephedrone was available at every house party and headshop and accessible from just about any house with an internet connection. You could buy anything up to 20 grammes at a time from online sellers, giving you a bulk buy price of £4 a gramme. Purity was high, and dosage cheap. However in April 2010, despite the misgivings of several advisors of the Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs, including its former chair, Professor David Nutt, who protested that mephedrone and its effects were unresearched and a much longer timeframe was needed to investigate it, Alan Johnson, the Home Secretary, made it illegal, claiming, “Mephedrone and its related substances have been shown to be dangerous and harmful”.

4mmc The Chemists are Winning: The Rise of Mephedrone and Legal Highs

Impounded illegal mephedrone

Neil Harvey, a community sergeant in Exeter, welcomed the ban, saying: “Use of the drug has been on the increase locally, as well as nationally, and we are aware of young people using it and the consequences of that. We are also aware of how easy it is to buy from shops and once the ban is formalised they must immediately stop selling it or we will prosecute as soon as it becomes law. … The law is going to prevent young people coming to harm and that can only be a good thing. We are always concerned that something might come along to replace it and we would need to be quick dealing with that if it happens. We have been very lucky so far in Exeter that no-one has been killed. But it has been luck. It is not designed for human consumption and anyone using it is taking a big risk with their health and safety.”

After mephedrone was banned, use did indeed drop among recreational drug users. One said, “Mephedrone was alright, but its advantage was that it was legal and you didn’t have any of the difficulties of supply and waiting around on dealers that you get with MDMA or ketamine. People just turned up with it at house parties and were very open about it. I know a lot of my friends who weren’t comfortable with taking illegal drugs were thrilled to get an MDMA-like experience that was cheap as well. Now it’s illegal, they’ve all stopped. I’ve largely stopped taking it as well. MDMA is far better when you can get hold of it.”

You can, of course, still buy mephedrone in Manchester, though the price has gone up to £20 a gram from £10 when it was legal. However, purity has dropped significantly since control of the supply has shifted from people buying it off wholesalers on the internet and into the hands of people who have a financial incentive to cut it with anything from talcum powder to concrete dust. So you can still take mephedrone if you have the cash, it’s just now more dangerous. James Jackson, Education Officer for Manchester Students for Sensible Drug Policy, a UMSU society, said, “Most recreational drug users don’t stop taking drugs because they’re illegal or because they are potentially harmful. We have to accept this. But they do try to take substances that they know are safe or that are safer than other drugs available. People want to get high, they don’t want to die or end up in hospital. That the government has made mephedrone illegal has actually endangered the health of drug users, because now no-one really knows whether the the stuff being sold as mephedrone is actually the drug they wanted.”

1400553827 ab0daaec7d The Chemists are Winning: The Rise of Mephedrone and Legal Highs

A leaf from a Sassafras tree.

People also forget why mephedrone suddenly became popular so quickly: more than the price, mephedrone’s perceived purity was much higher than other available street drugs and that appealed to users – no-one chooses to take worming powder, after all. Cocaine purity had fallen from 60% in 1999 to 22% in 2009; people were literally getting less bang for their buck. More significantly, 33 tonnes of sassafras oil, the precursor to MDMA and a vital ingredient, was seized in Cambodia in June 2008. It has been estimated that it could have been used to make 245 million doses of MDMA. Such tightening of controls on sassafras oil and other substances meant that purity tests in mid-2010 have revealed that virtually no pills seized by the police contain MDMA at all – and 20% of pills seized since 2009 contain mephedrone. Market forces drove people to mephedrone, and when the cost and the convenience became too high, people just moved onto something else.

Other drugs have been in the pipeline since the banning of mephedrone. NRG-1, or naphyrone, a stimulant chemically similar to mephedrone, was banned two months after mephedrone on the same grounds. “Ivory Wave” was the latest legal high to hit the headlines in August, though no-one’s really sure what it is. Producing intense euphoria but with a vicious comedown, some test samples have discovered MDPV, or methylenedioxypyrovalerone, a cathinone which was banned at the same time as mephedrone. Mephedrone itself was banned shortly after the well-publicised proscription of GBL, BZP and Spice last December. So with those out the way, we can just wait for the next legal high, and the next one, and the cycle of discovery-use-popularity-ban can continue.

 The Chemists are Winning: The Rise of Mephedrone and Legal Highs

The only drug that will kill you if you follow the instructions.

Of course, in the excitement of talking about the dangers of mephedrone and Ivory Wave and the next deadly designer drug that will come along, people forget about the most lethal legal highs, simply because they are embedded into our culture: alcohol and tobacco. Tim Hollis, the serving Chief Constable of Humberside Police and chair of the Association of Chief Police Officers’ drugs committee is currently the most senior police officer to call for the decriminalisation of possession of drugs for personal use. His greatest concern, however, was not illegal drugs. “My personal belief in terms of sheer scale of harm is that one of the most dangerous drugs in this country is alcohol. Alcohol is a lawful drug. Likewise, nicotine is a lawful drug, but cigarettes can kill,” he said. “There is a wider debate on the impacts to our community about all aspects of drugs, of which illicit drugs are one modest part.” The facts bear Hollis out: 25,000 people are killed a year by alcohol-related illnesses, and 106,000 people from smoking. By contrast 3000 people a year die as a result of all illegal drugs combined, including 10 from ecstasy every year, and precisely none whatsoever from mephedrone, LSD, or even cannabis, the most widely used illegal drug in the UK. Despite strictly regulating advertising, taxation, and labelling, however, no government has sought to ban either alcohol or tobacco.

Guinness Toucan ad The Chemists are Winning: The Rise of Mephedrone and Legal Highs

An advertising campaign for Guiness in the 1940s.

It seems likely that the endless government attempts to ban every drug that is sold for recreational use will continue to push users into more and more unknown, and therefore more dangerous, drugs. The research done on the more conventional street drugs, such as ecstasy and LSD, now fills whole libraries – more recent research is even starting to turn up medicinal uses for drugs that have previously been the exclusive remit of trippers. LSD, for example, was discovered in 2006 to be unexpectedly effective at curing cluster headaches, an condition where sufferers can have headaches painful and debilitating that some have committed suicide. It seems unlikely that LSD will be available on prescription anytime soon; however, through long study and, yes, usage, science has determined that LSD is safe and in some cases, useful. The same can not be said about mephedrone or any of the legal highs.

The race between amateur chemists to develop new designer drugs that exist just outside the law and the government to try to ban them without any understanding of their long-term effects and use has now been running for forty years – and the chemists are winning. But as recreational users are pushed more and more onto drugs about which we know less and less, a better question than “Who are the winners?” might be “Who are the losers?”

20drugs The Chemists are Winning: The Rise of Mephedrone and Legal Highs

A graph of relative harms of common drugs produced by Professor David Nutt.

News reports:

  • Cuts prompt police to call for debate on drugs and redirect resources
  • Ivory Wave: The new meow meow?
  • Banned mephedrone cleared of blame for two deaths
  • Ban on NRG-1 ‘legal high’ recommended by drug advisers
  • Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

    Related Posts:

    Why Prison Doesn’t Work: An Essay

    Monday, June 28th, 2010

    Originally written for a competition by the Howard League for Penal Reform for essays on the topic of “Why Prisons Don’t Work”. You can read the winning (and excellent) essays here.

    3005960072 baf2774109 Why Prison Doesnt Work: An Essay

    It is often said “prison works”. It is less often said what it means for a prison to “work”. Traditionally prisons have been argued to serve at least one of three functions: to punish the prisoner, to protect the public, and to rehabilitate the offender to prevent them committing another crime. However, on closer inspection, the reasons given seem to have secondary important to the need for society to feel like something is being done, that justice is being served, that law and order is being kept, with near-total disregard for those who find themselves shut out of society with no hope of redemption.

    The first function given for prison, punishment, has always seemed to have the least force. Setting aside the dubious civility of a society which seeks revenge upon its citizenry, is spending £30,000 a year on keeping someone in prison when most prisoners really hurting them, or us? (1) Rehabilitation, a far more worthy aim, is chronically underfunded and ultimately useless in a system which is often referred to as a “university of crime”, where young impressionable offenders quickly pick up new skills from veteran prisoners and criminals and escalate their offences when they are released. Which leaves the protection of the public as the remaining reason, and the reason that prisons came about in the first place. Imprisoning those who threaten others seems slightly more justifiable. But this has to be balanced with the human rights of those convicted of crimes themselves – can we justify the imprisonment of such people? Does our society ultimately benefit from keeping people away under lock and key?

    In 1993, the psychologist Terrie Moffett published a paper in the Psychological Review that argued that there were two fundamental types of prisoner – the adolescent-limited and the lifelong-persistent. The adolescent-limited are young, primarily men, who commit crime to support themselves, for fun, as part of a gang, or other reasons, who eventually mature, settle down and give up the lifestyle that was contributing to their criminality. The second type, lifelong-persistent, are people who commit crimes casually and often, moving through the criminal justice system in a perpetual cycle of crime-arrest-conviction-incarceration-release-crime and rarely, if ever, breaking out of that cycle. There are a variety of reasons both types end up in prison, including poor education, drug addiction, racism (young black men are twice as likely to go to prison than to university. (2)) and mental health difficulties, which are again rarely, if ever, given the attention they deserve.

    46442359 cf7bc5c5d2 Why Prison Doesnt Work: An Essay

    Neither type of prisoner are prevented from committing more crime or given the chance to change their lives through serving prison sentences. The adolescent-limited, young and not really thinking about the consequences of their actions, find themselves permanently disadvantaged for the rest of their lives; upon release from prison, they struggle to find housing, meaningful employment and integration into society. It becomes easier to continue to commit more crimes to support themselves. Some will settle down and find councils and employers to give them a chance in life, but their potential, especially the potential of young black men, is severely compromised by serving a prison sentence, a physical block to their life’s progress as well as a permanent addition to their CV. Likewise, the lifelong-persistent are let down by our society. To deal with the reasons for people returning to prison over and over again, we require drug treatment programmes, mental health treatment, adult education, housing programmes, and ways of giving people pride and hope in themselves. But, when regarding that list, how much of it can be achieved effectively in a prison?

    However, the rhetoric of the redtops of this country considers such proposals merely “pampering criminals”. Their attitude is largely that prison is for punishing people that society disapproves of. But if by prison “working”, we mean “reduces crime”, the only crime reduced is that which the imprisoned would have committed while doing time – as mentioned earlier, the recidivism rate for people who have been to prison more than twice is nearly 70%, so clearly prison does not “teach people a lesson”. But most advocates of prison do not care about that: they want to “see justice served” as opposed to actually seeing crime reduced and those who commit crime changing their lives. Jon Venables and Robert Thompson were both locked up for ten years – one has now been rehabilitated and is trying to build a new life, one has gone back into prison for breaking his parole. The press wants to see them both imprisoned at great cost to the taxpayer regardless of their current circumstances, and with the broad support of their readers, it seems. With such calls, can we really say society cares about whether prison works or not?

    544459833 0ba01d97d5 Why Prison Doesnt Work: An Essay

    Ultimately, the way we treat prisoners as a society reflect on our humanity. Dostoevsky famously wrote “The degree of civilization in a society can be judged by entering its prisons.” However, it is also the mark of a functional, thriving society that its citizens feel safe and protected from those who would do them harm. People who kill, rape, steal, assault and engage in other anti-social behaviour are causing us as individuals and as a community harm and need to be dealt with. We need evidence-based solutions to tackle the problems that leads people to commit crime. But is prison really effective at this? Can prison deal with poverty, drug addiction, racism, patriarchy, social breakdown, senses of insecurity, resentment, or entitlement? Unlikely. Perhaps prisons “work” to give us a sense of satisfaction that something has been done – but do prisons “work” to create a safer, more secure society that protects its citizens, prevents crime, and rehabilitates those citizens who find themselves on the wrong side of the law? The evidence would suggest that as a society we have got our definition very wrong.

    (1) Kanazawa, Satishi (24th August, 2008), “When crime rates go down, recidivism rates go up”, Psychology Today. Accessed 19th April, 2010.
    (2) Smart Justice (2004), “The Racial Justice Gap: Race and the Prison Population Briefing”, pg 2.

    Visit the Howard League for Penal Reform.

    Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

    Related Posts:

    M.E.N.S.: What the Men’s Society has been up to

    Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

    Originally written for Student Direct, but missed the print deadline.

    mens society facebook logo M.E.N.S.: What the Mens Society has been up to

    The Men’s Society was born last summer into a hailstorm of criticism. Although some of it was valid (approaching people with beards and imploring them to join the Men’s Society at Freshers = lame), a lot of it wasn’t (pretty much everything else). Sometimes it was just funny: our critics, the most vocal of whom have always hailed from the far left end of the political spectrum, gave each of us little epithets that they would repeat every time they attacked the Men’s Society – the Chair was an evil Tory, the Liason Officer was an Orange Lodge member. Mine was that I wanted to restrict abortion. It brightened the monotony of letter after letter claiming we were all misogynists trying to bring down the women’s movement through drinking beer and watching tv (always effective methods of counter-revolution…) to see which of us was being cryptically insulted this time.

    However, we pressed on. With over 300 sign-ups, it shouldn’t have been difficult to form as a society, however, certain members of the Society Activities Committee objected to the name “Men’s Society” because it was exclusive; rather as the Jewish Society, Irish Society, and Medic Panto Society are exclusive… But we changed name anyway and Masculinity, Exploring, Networking and Support (M.E.N.S.) was approved as a UMSU Society.

    So, what have we actually got up to? We started off with a sober pub crawl, to raise money for homeless shelters. We held a film showing with Openmedia of “Tough Guise”, a exploration of the media and masculine identity. We did an interview for a Dutch documentary about our perceptions of masculinity. On the pastoral front, we asked Nightline for active listening training, and then set about setting up a weekly M.E.N.S. peer support drop-in. Our Welfare Co-ordinator, Aiden, has created a archive of resources at http://mensresources.blogspot.com – she’s done a great job.

    In March we held March Hair, a contest to raise money for testicular and prostate cancer charities through modifying your hair in some way, which raised over £300. Hair modification made it more open than the first-mooted beard-growing competition, because not all people of any gender can grow beards, our critics ignored that change and continued to berate us for proposing beard-growing competitions at all.

    Perhaps we didn’t deconstruct masculine gender identity as much as we could have, but it’s hard to do that in the face of your critics bleating on about how we supposedly spend our days watching Top Gear, making it difficult to have a sensible discussion. Perhaps we haven’t managed to give everything we’ve done the publicity it should have: hopefully that will change next year. But all in all, once people stopped shouting at us, we managed to raise awareness of men’s issues, make some money for good causes, and have some fun. And the world didn’t end.

    Visit M.E.N.S. on Facebook.

    Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

    Related Posts:

    He shoots, he scores! Oh, what an own goal! GBL and the politics of drug policy.

    Saturday, December 26th, 2009

    I am not exactly ignorant of drugs and their uses, but I had never heard of something called “GBL” until I checked the news one day and discovered the government was planning to ban it. GBL is a synthetic drug similar to GHB, which induces mild euphoria and drowsiness at low doses and loss of motor function and sleepiness at higher doses. The government in its press release called it “dangerous” and “lethal”, but on reading the article it seemed that an entire drug was being prohibited, with all the attendant enforcement costs, because two people had died in using GBL in combination with other drugs – always a stupid move, but paracetemol and alcohol are also a lethal combination and neither of those are banned, or even prescription-only. So why GBL?

    The answer lies in the way the government treats drugs as a political football. In wanting to appear “tough on drugs”, ministers enact harsh and sweeping legislation with little regard to the human cost involved. Alan Johnson, the Home Secretary, has launched a £200,000 “information awareness campaign” that does little more than tell people that GBL will kill them and they shouldn’t take it. Personally, I doubt anyone will be listening, least of all GBL users, who know better than anyone that GBL doesn’t instantly kill most people because, well, they’re alive. Gordon Brown, however, just doesn’t seem to care about the evidence, just as he didn’t when cannabis was raised to Class B earlier this year. Despite cannabis use having fallen among 18-25 year olds by 5% since its declassification to Class C, and despite the Advisory Committee on the Misuse of Drugs (the advisory body to the government on the drug laws) reporting that enforcement costs would rise by millions of pounds, disproportionately affect ethnic minorities and have little, if any impact on use, Gordon Brown claimed that we needed to “send a message” to people that cannabis isn’t safe. So cannabis was duly reclassified and users can now be jailed for five instead of two years. Nice message. How many of your friends cared?

    The problem with this kind of draconian legislation is that the law does not reflect reality, and the reality is that people take drugs, and are not going to stop doing so. The earliest recorded use of cannabis as been dated to 4000BC – and we think we can eradicate drug use? The Manchester Evening News recently carried a front page article by a 22 year old who had become addicted to GBL and now wanted it made illegal – would she really have preferred to have been imprisoned to the drug treatment she is now receiving? Would it have helped her to have swapped her GBL addiction to heroin instead, the drug choice of most prisoners? Should we also imprison all alcoholics? Criminalisation is a simple answer to a very complex problem, and it just isn’t effective. By stigmatising and criminalising drug users, we basically shut them out of society and force them to crime in order to support themselves, fuelling a downward spiral of destructiveness that they cannot escape and which accordingly damages them and their community.  How does this make sense?

    Criminalisation does makes sense if you make a living from stigmatising drug users and use, however. My local paper ran a campaign some months ago to campaign against the opening of a drug addiction treatment centre, on the premise that “we don’t want our communities to be filled with drug addicts.” The fact that it would be better to have drug addicts committed to getting off drugs might be better than drug addicts roaming their neighbourhoods shooting up upon street corners seemed to elude them. One woman was quoted as saying “If this centre opens, I won’t be able to let my children go outside, it just won’t be safe.” Safe? They’re drug addicts, not paedophiles! But of course, few in the media are interested in making that distinction. And where the Daily Mail leads, politicians follow (in fact the BNP has a policy of applying the death penalty to murderers, terrorists, drug dealers and paedophiles). Drug use and users are just another football to sell papers and jeer at the government, which responds with ever harsher laws, that are expensive, invasive, and ultimately hurt the people they are allegedly trying to protect.

    If we want to have any real effect on the thousands of people who have their lives ruined by all drugs, from alcohol to heroin, we have to stop treating drug users like naughty children who don’t know what’s good for them. We have to give people accurate information about the drugs they are choosing to take, and stop threatening to lock people up for making those choices, which is expensive and counter-productive. The political parties have to stop treating drugs like a political football to get one over on the other team, because ultimately we’re only kicking ourselves while innocent people are being crushed on the sidelines.

    Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

    Related Posts: