Archive for May, 2010

Letter to The Guardian re autism as a “distressing illness”

Thursday, May 27th, 2010

Published in the Guardian today here.

Sir,

I must take exception to your recent reference to autism as a “distressing illness” (Andrew Wakefield case highlights the importance of ethics in science, 24th May). I am autistic, and I am not ill, sick, or retarded – I merely think differently to other people, and subsequently find it harder to understand how other people think. All autistic spectrum disorders may be summed up thus to a greater or lesser extent. If others find that distressing, that is their problem, not mine. But I am not ill.

Yours faithfully,

Sarah McCulloch

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

A 10 Point Guide to House Searches by the Police, Or, What to do When your Flatmates Scab on You

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

451940 A 10 Point Guide to House Searches by the Police, Or, What to do When your Flatmates Scab on You

As some of you may be aware, my flatmate and wife Jess Bradley went off and got herself arrested at Manchester Airport yesterday protesting about climate change. And as some of you may be aware, the police have a habit of searching the houses of people who go locking themselves to aeroplanes. :)

I had a vague hunch that it was possible that we might be getting a visit from the boys in blue, so I had cleaned the house beforehand (student pits never being empty of vast quantities of crap); my other two flatmates decided it would be a good idea to be away for the weekend. When I sent them a message telling them Jess had been arrested and we were likely to be searched and I didn’t want to be alone in the house when the police came, they ignored it (and had an extended argument about the age of consent on Facebook instead, so I know they got it). I believe the term that they so often use for others who betray their comrades is “scabs”. Thanks for that, guys.

But anyway. Having spent some time looking up what to do in the event of the police turning up with a warrant to search your house, for whatever reason, I came up somewhat short. So here is my guide to what to do, and people are most welcome to leave additional advice in the comments section.

US Navy 040218 N 8228R 023 An Italian military police officer stands watch as another searches for possible threats A 10 Point Guide to House Searches by the Police, Or, What to do When your Flatmates Scab on You

1) Make sure someone is in! The police have authority to force entry to unoccupied premises, and if there’s no reason to have your door broken down, don’t put yourself in the situation of trying to explain to your landlord the ethics of environmental direct action and why he shouldn’t take your deposit out of solidarity…

2) Look up the police search powers for the situation you are in. There are numerous bits of legislation regarding what the police can or cannot do depending on why they are searching your house: Liberty has a briefing on police powers to search premises.

3) Write everything relevant down for you in a notebook you can carry around when the police turn up. That way you can refer to your notes if they start doing interesting things like demanding information you don’t have to give. Even if you don’t need it, it can boost your confidence and keep the police to their legal powers if they realise that you’re prepared. Note down what they look through and if they take anything or do something suspicious.

4) If you have any idea that a raid on your house is likely, clean your house out of all incriminating evidence of anything at all. Remove drugs, warning letters from the TV licencing authority, proof that you’ve broken the law, illegal downloading, pirate DVDs, etc. You never know. Also clean it out of all embarrassing things – it’s not going to get you into trouble but it will certainly raise some eyebrows when they find all your dirty washing up in the yard, a bowl of human hair in the kitchen and several thousand condoms in the living room. I have learned from this experience. :P

5) If you live with or are an activist who may or may not find themselves in a police cell at some point and you live in a HMO, a House of Multiple Occupancy, you may want to put signs on all your doors indicating who lives there. The police only have the authority to search the room of the person they’ve arrested and communal areas. It is also a good idea to lock the rooms of everyone else to stop wandering policemen.

6) When the police turn up, they need to show you police identification. When they leave, they need to leave you a record of the search. You are also entitled to a Notice of Powers and Rights – they didn’t actually give me one, but it didn’t matter greatly because I also had everything written down in my notebook. :)

7) Don’t say anything. The police get trained to elicit information by pretending to be friendly and “just doing the job”. They asked me what my degree was “because it’s interesting to know what kind of degree you could be doing and living here”, what I wanted to do when I graduated (and one of them asked “a full-time anarchist, perhaps?”), where my flatmates were and what they were doing (I confess a bitterly muttered “he fucked off to Sheffield” accidentally passed my lips there, but they didn’t get anything else than that). They also (falsely) claimed to have found a kebab in Jess’ room in what was an apparent attempt to get me to tell them Jess’ dietary requirements. The police lie, collude, and scheme. Don’t forget that.

8) Try to have someone else there. It is wildly unlikely, but not inconceivable that the police could decide to arrest you on some pretext to get you out of the way so they can be naughty. I had a friend round stay the night before to keep me company but sadly they had to leave before the police actually turned up – so I dealt with the police alone, because my flatmates didn’t come back…

9) For the same reason, as with all encounters with the police, make sure you have legal numbers on your person just in case you do get arrested (where they can’t see it – no point causing undue questions…). The chances that you will ever need them is very small, but hey, I never thought I was going to get kettled for seven hours demonstrating peacefully outside the Carbon Exchange in London – these things happen. :)

10) Don’t worry. I realise this is a futile point for people who have been arrested or searched before or have years of activist experience behind them, but I’d never had my house raided by the police before and it was a mildly nerve-wracking experience waiting around for them, but it turned out to be less getting my door smashed in and having cops in riot gear rushing through my house shouting “clear!” with laser sights on their automatic weapons, and more some very boring looking plain clothes policemen irritated at being shifted off solving murders to search the home of some activist for evidence that wasn’t there.

I hope that is useful for everyone. If you’ve cleaned your house, researched police powers and generally give off the impression that you know what you’re doing, they shouldn’t try anything – but I’m sure every activist can think of times when it all went horribly wrong. Be prepared. Now go forth and protest. :P

2464007264 ba746160f4 A 10 Point Guide to House Searches by the Police, Or, What to do When your Flatmates Scab on You

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

Liberal Democrat Special Conference – …and its amendments

Monday, May 17th, 2010

I was already booked to attend another conference this weekend, so was unable to attend the Liberal Democrat Special Conference in Birmingham this weekend. Just reading through all the coverage of it, especially on Twitter and over at Lib Dem Voice, no-one really mentions all the amendments that were passed into the main motion, some of which are very interesting. However I may feel about the coalition, given the wide range of subjects and movers, the Lib Dems are far more democratic than Labour or the Conservatives.

To what extent it is actually of any use to “affirm” commitments to scrapping tuition fees when the coalition agreement that was approved by the same motion explicitly states that Liberal Democrat MPs and peers shall abstain on the issue on tuition fees if the Browne Review recommends raising the cap (which it will almost certainly do) is debatable. Similarly, affirming a commitment to LGBT equality is all very well but what does that actually mean when the minister for equality, presumably approved by Nick Clegg, has voted against LGBT rights whenever she can? I guess coalitions take us into strange territory. I hope that our leadership, and government, as I suppose we must now call them, will not ignore the amendments to this motion.

All the amendment can all be found in the Conference Extra document that was put out today, but I include them below:

Amendment 1
Moved by: Evan Harris
Supported by 14 conference representatives

“Conference notes that negotiations with the Labour party were not fruitful, despite the best endeavours and good faith of the Liberal Democrat negotiating team, because many in the Labour Party did not wish to participate in a coalition with the Liberal Democrats or to continue in government; and that therefore it was not possible to form a stable administration with the Labour Party.

Conference further notes that a stable coalition with the Conservatives with a clear partnership agreement has significant advantages for the country, for the implementation of progressive policies and for the creation of a more cooperative style of politics compared to the remaining option of a minority Conservative administration.”

Amendment 2
Moved by: David Grace
Supported by 15 conference representatives

“Conference recognises that party members in government and in parliament will be bound by the usual conventions and by the terms of this agreement but declares that the Liberal Democrats remain an independent political party and that nothing in this agreement prevents the party from developing new policy through it’s democratic processes.”

Amendment 3
Moved by: James Graham
Supported by 23 conference representatives

“Conference calls for Liberal Democrats to work constructively in government to ensure that the net income and wealth inequality gap is reduced significantly over the course of this parliament.”

Amendment 4
Moved by: Liberal Youth

“Conference notes that many Liberal Democrat MPs signed the NUS ‘vote for students’ pledge against any real terms rise in the tuition fee cap. Conference calls upon Liberal Democrat ministers and MPs to ensure that on any decision made on Lord Browne’s report on higher education funding, they above all else take into account the impact on student debt. Conference affirms the Liberal Democrat objective of scrapping tuition fees.”

Amendment 5
Moved by: David Matthewman
Supported by 10 conference representatives

“Conference urges Liberal Democrat ministers and MPs to take all possible steps to ensure the repeal of those sections of the Digital Economy Act 2010 which are inconsistent with policy motion Freedom, Creativity and the Internet as passed at Spring Conference 2010.”

Amendment 6
Moved by: Jo Shaw
Supported by 10 conference representatives

“Conference also calls on Liberal Democrat ministers and MPs, in line with the Liberal Democrat manifesto commitment to protect the Human Rights Act 1998, to oppose moves by any party or individual towards repeal of this act.”

Amendment 7
Moved by: Dave Page
Supported by DELGA

“Conference reaffirms the party’s long-standing and unparalleled commitment to matters relating to lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans equality.”

Amendment 8
Moved by: David Wright
Supported by Harlow Local Party

“Conference calls on Liberal Democrat ministers and MPs to seek to include proportional representation for local government elections in England and Wales as apart of the political reform programme of the coalition government.”

Amendment 9
Moved by: David Rendel
Supported by Newbury Local Party

“Conference regrets that it proved impossible to agree the introduction of a system of proportional representation for elections to the House of Commons, and reaffirms the party’s long-standing commitment to the introduction of such a system.”

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts:

SarahMcCulloch.com vs. Poland

Sunday, May 16th, 2010

I looked at my Google Analytics profile in some astonishment. 8000 visitors already? Woah. I looked at the global map to find out where they were all coming from and going to. They were all visiting the full chemical name of Titin, which is the longest word in the English language – as that page is the most popular on my website, I wasn’t very surprised. But the map of what country were visiting from was a bit more surprising. Like usual, the UK and America were roughly even in traffic – but there was a little speck in the heart of Europe that was a green so dark it was nearly black. Poland. 90% of my traffic for that day was coming from Poland. What the hell?

4612814093 799aa79763 SarahMcCulloch.com vs. Poland

16,000 Poles visit in 24 hours

I ran upstairs to tell my mum, who looks after the technical side of my website. She messaged Pete, our friend who provides our hosting, but while we were waiting for him to reply, another 4000 Poles turned up. My bandwidth only allows for roughly 20,000 visitors, and with the same amount of traffic in a day then I usually got in a month, my website exceeded its bandwidth and was automatically taken offline.

At this point, Pete turned up and switched SarahMcCulloch.com back on. The insane number of visitors started up again and by midnight, 17,000 people had accessed my website. 17,000! Why on earth did 17,000 people from Poland all suddenly want to view this single page? Panic was setting in in my house. Pete was going to Iceland in the morning and wouldn’t be around to deal with the problem if, as seemed increasingly likely, I was going to exceed my new bandwidth limit as well. And if my website went down again, Pete wouldn’t be around to put it back on again – my entire website, and my blog, would be gone until Pete got back.

We were literally in a race against Poland.

My mum contacted another friend with unlimited hosting to see if we could move that specific page so my poor abused bandwidth could get a break. Meanwhile, I tried to work out what had happened in Poland that its entire population had suddenly taken an interest in English linguistics. Google Analytics was showing that most of our visitors had tapped the website into the url bar, with no referring link. We had no way of finding out what or who was sending thousands of visitors an hour to Sm.com. I started to look through the rest of my referring links, looking through the newer ones to find a clue to this mystery that was getting weirder by the second. But there was nothing obvious. I was baffled.

Eventually, after a message out of the blue from a Pole who had tracked me down on Facebook after viewing my website, I found out what had happened. Demotywatory.pl, a Polish equivalent of verydemotivational.com, had put up a poster with a picture of Titin, some Polish, and a link to my website underneath. I put the words into Google Translator and from the drivel that came out, it would seem that some wag had put up the longest word in the Polish language, Konstantynopolitańczykowianeczka, and a caption something along the lines of “Konstantynopolitańczykowianeczka can get lost”.

4612813923 b306061e04 SarahMcCulloch.com vs. Poland

My dashboard for the month Poland visited

The mystery was solved, but the traffic was still coming. By the end of the second day, another 9,000 Poles had visited my website. I held my breath. A quarter of the new bandwidth limit had gone already in just 24 hours. Next day 5,000 people visited. The next day we managed to get the page hosted elsewhere and I breathed a sigh of relief. SarahMcCulloch.com was safe. Until the next traffic spike…

[Update December 2010]: After nearly six months of insane amounts of traffic from Poland, Poles remain among my biggest fans, though traffic levels have now fallen to something a bit more manageable. In the meantime, like all website owners, we have bandwidth to pay for. So, people of Poland, I welcome you, but if you or anyone else who has found this story amusing could make a donation in the tip jar below, I (and my mum) would be grateful. Thank you!

Love,

Sarah

pixel SarahMcCulloch.com vs. Poland

Subscribe to SarahMcCulloch.com via Email! (or via RSS!)

Related Posts: